Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39336026›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Exploring Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake among Women in the United States: Impact of Social Determinants of Health and Psychosocial Determinants.

Matthew Asare, Eyram Owusu-Sekyere, Anjelica Elizondo, Gabriel A Benavidez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Kennedy v Braidwood Ruling Affects Women and Cervical Cancer Screening.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthew AsareDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6831-3586
Eyram Owusu-SekyereDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-9877-3876
Anjelica ElizondoDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.
Gabriel A BenavidezDepartment of Public Health, Robbins College of Health and Human Sciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2268-6229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several non-medical factors, such as income, education, and access to care, directly or indirectly affect adherence to cancer screening guidelines. We examined the impact of social determinants of health (SDOH) and psychosocial factors on screening behavior in a nationally representative sample of women in the US. A retrospective population-level cross-sectional sample was extracted from the 2022 Health Information National Trends Survey. The dependent variables were the interest in cervical cancer screening and the screening behavior. The independent variables included SDOH and psychosocial factors. Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographics and covariates, and population-based estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were produced for Pap testing behaviors. Logistic regression models assessed differences in Pap testing based on SDOH and psychosocial factors, adjusting for covariates. The study included 2224 women with a mean age of 46.96. Results showed that 90% of women were interested in cervical cancer screening, with an 80% screening rate. Screening rates varied by age and rurality. SDOH and psychosocial factors influenced both interest and actual screening, with 3% and 1% impacts, respectively. These findings suggest that SDOH and psychosocial factors are associated with cervical cancer screening uptake, highlighting the need for policies to address these disparities. Policies must be directed at bridging the gap created by these SDOHs. Public health professionals and researchers can design interventions using the SDOH and psychosocial frameworks to increase cervical cancer screening uptake.

Indexed as

cervical cancerpsychosocial factorsscreeningsocial determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID39336026
PMCPMC11428532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.