Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335992›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Takotsubo Syndrome or Peripartum Cardiomyopathy? Depends on Who You Are Talking to.

Abigail O Falola, Naveed Razvi, Ruta Gada, David R Thompson, Colin R Martin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Abigail O FalolaEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK.
Naveed RazviEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK.
Ruta GadaEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Ipswich IP4 5PD, UK.
David R ThompsonSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast BT9 7BL, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8518-6307
Colin R MartinInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Suffolk, Suffolk IP4 1QJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Takotsubo syndrome (otherwise known as broken-heart syndrome or left ventricular apical ballooning) is a rare cause of reversible heart failure that predominantly affects postmenopausal women. It was first described by Japanese researchers in the 1990s and has become established as a differential for heart failure following a physically or psychologically stressful event. This was popularised by a spike in cases following natural disasters in Japan. As the recognition of takotsubo syndrome in the differential diagnosis for sudden, onset heart failure in a previously healthy individual has grown, so has the discussion concerning takotsubo in the peripartum period. Peripartum cardiomyopathy is a rare cause of reversible heart failure in the latter weeks of pregnancy and the postpartum period. Morbidity and mortality for both cardiomyopathies can be highly variable, ranging from complete recovery of cardiac function to life threatening arrhythmias and even death. This rapid review highlights the similarities between both cardiomyopathies and challenges the hitherto assumption that both takotsubo and peripartum cardiomyopathies are distinct entities that can easily be distinguished from one another. The implications of this are significant within the context of the behavioural aspects of diagnosis, treatment, and outcome.

Indexed as

apical ballooning syndromebroken-heart syndromeclinical decision-makingperipartum syndromestress syndromestructural equation modellingtakotsubo syndrome

Identifiers

PMID39335992
PMCPMC11428684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.