Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335943›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

In Vitro Human Gastrointestinal Digestibility and Colonic Fermentation of Wheat Sourdough and Yeast Breads.

Ccori Martinez Tuppia, Mohammad N Rezaei, François Machuron, Cindy Duysburgh, Jonas Ghyselinck, Massimo Marzorati, Jonna E B Koper, Céline Monnet, Nabil Bosco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ccori Martinez TuppiaLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, 59700 Marcq-en-Barœul, France.
Mohammad N RezaeiLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, 59700 Marcq-en-Barœul, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6626-6739
François MachuronLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, 59700 Marcq-en-Barœul, France.
Cindy DuysburghProdigest, Technologiepark 82, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Jonas GhyselinckProdigest, Technologiepark 82, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Massimo MarzoratiProdigest, Technologiepark 82, 9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium.
Jonna E B KoperLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, 59700 Marcq-en-Barœul, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1929-6791
Céline MonnetLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, 59700 Marcq-en-Barœul, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0492-5062
Nabil BoscoLesaffre Institute of Science and Technology, 59700 Marcq-en-Barœul, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3887-7049

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bread can vary in textural and nutritional attributes based on differences in the bread making process (e.g., flour type, fermentation agent, fermentation time). Four bread recipes (BRs) made with sourdough preferments (BR1, white flour; BR2, whole grain flour) or regular yeast breads (BR3, white flour; BR4, whole grain flour) were evaluated for texture, digestibility, and their effect on the metabolic activity and composition of the gut microbiota using texture profile analysis (TPA) coupled with in vitro upper gastrointestinal (GIT) digestion and colonic fermentation (Colon-on-a-plate™ model), using fecal samples from eight healthy human donors. TPA revealed significantly higher values for hardness, fracturability, gumminess, and chewiness, and significantly lower values for springiness, cohesiveness, and resilience with whole grain versus white breads (all

Indexed as

colonic fermentationgut microbiomein vitro digestibilitynutrient bio-accessibilitywheat bread

Identifiers

PMID39335943
PMCPMC11431057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.