Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335926›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Variation and Abundance of Resistant Starch in Selected Banana Cultivars in Uganda.

Ali Kajubi, Rhona Baingana, Moses Matovu, Ronald Katwaza, Jerome Kubiriba, Priver Namanya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ali KajubiNational Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL), Kampala P.O. Box 7065, Uganda.ORCID 0009-0008-2676-5665
Rhona BainganaCollege of Natural Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala P.O. Box 7062, Uganda.
Moses MatovuNational Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL), Kampala P.O. Box 7065, Uganda.
Ronald KatwazaNational Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL), Kampala P.O. Box 7065, Uganda.
Jerome KubiribaNational Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL), Kampala P.O. Box 7065, Uganda.
Priver NamanyaNational Agricultural Research Laboratories (NARL), Kampala P.O. Box 7065, Uganda.

Funding

United States Agency for International Development CGIAR Fund II-AID-BFS-10-17-00005, 2020-2024.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The physiochemical, structural, and molecular characteristics of starch influence its functional properties, thereby dictating its utilization. The study aimed to profile the properties and quantity of resistant starch (RS) from 15 different banana varieties, extracted using a combination of alkaline and enzyme treatments. Granular structure and molecular organization were analyzed using light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The physiochemical and functional properties were also investigated. RS content ranged from 49% to 80% without significant relationship to amylose (AM) (r = -0.1062). SEM revealed significant microarchitectural differences on the granules potentially affecting granule digestibility. FTIR and chemometrics identified differences in the crystalline peaks, yielding varying degrees of the molecular order of the RS polymers that aid in differentiating the RS sources. Despite similar solubility and swelling profiles, the pasting profiles varied across varieties, indicating high paste stability in hydrothermal processing. Clarity ranged from 43% to 93%, attributed to amylose leaching. This study highlights that RS from bananas varies in quantity, structure, and functionality, necessitating individualized approaches for processing and utilization.

Indexed as

bananachemometricscrystallinemicroarchitecturenutraceuticalresistant starch

Identifiers

PMID39335926
PMCPMC11431251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.