Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335783›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

[18F]FDG PET/CT Integration in Evaluating Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer: A Clinician's Practical Approach.

Juliette Brezun, Nicolas Aide, Evelyne Peroux, Jean-Laurent Lamboley, Fabrice Gutman, David Lussato, Carole Helissey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Imaging Immunotherapy.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Juliette BrezunDepartment of Medical Oncology and Clinical Research Unit, Military Hospital Bégin, 94160 Saint-Mandé, France.ORCID 0009-0001-9122-9585
Nicolas AideINSERM ANTICIPE U1086, Caen University, 14000 Caen, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9207-0847
Evelyne PerouxDepartment of Radiology, Military Hospital Laveran, 13013 Marseille, France.
Jean-Laurent LamboleyDepartment of Radiology, Military Hospital Bégin, 94160 Saint-Mandé, France.
Fabrice GutmanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Paul d'Egine Hospital, 94500 Champigny-sur-Marne, France.
David LussatoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Cardiologique du Nord, 93200 Saint-Denis, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8518-5395
Carole HelisseyDepartment of Medical Oncology and Clinical Research Unit, Military Hospital Bégin, 94160 Saint-Mandé, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7774-349X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment paradigm of lung cancer, resulting in notable enhancements in patient survival. Nevertheless, evaluating treatment response in patients undergoing immunotherapy poses distinct challenges due to unconventional response patterns like pseudoprogressive disease (PPD), dissociated response (DR), and hyperprogressive disease (HPD). Conventional response criteria such as the RECIST 1.1 may not adequately address these complexities. To tackle this issue, novel response criteria such as the iRECIST and imRECIST have been proposed, enabling a more comprehensive assessment of treatment response by incorporating additional scans and considering the best overall response even after radiologic progressive disease evaluation. Additionally, [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging has emerged as a valuable modality for evaluating treatment response, with various metabolic response criteria such as the PERCIMT, imPERCIST, and iPERCIST developed to overcome the limitations of traditional criteria, particularly in detecting pseudoprogression. A multidisciplinary approach involving oncologists, radiologists, and nuclear medicine specialists is crucial for effectively navigating these complexities and enhancing patient outcomes in the era of immunotherapy for lung cancer. In this review, we delineate the key components of these guidelines, summarizing essential aspects for radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians. Furthermore, we provide insights into how imaging can guide the management of individual lung cancer patients in real-world multidisciplinary settings.

Indexed as

[18F]FDG PET/CT imagingimmune checkpoint inhibitorslung cancertreatment response assessment

Identifiers

PMID39335783
PMCPMC11431382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.