ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) in Digestive Healthcare: Regulatory Challenges and Ethical Implications.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing Spinal Cord Stimulation and Neuromodulation for Functional Restoration: From Pain Management to Motor Recovery.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Digital health technologies for the management of sarcopenia in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: a narrative review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Correlation of contrast-enhancing tumor region on pre-radiotherapy MRI with overall survival in glioblastoma.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and Colposcopy: Detection and Classification of Vulvar HPV-Related Low-Grade and High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: Transforming Diagnostics, Treatment, and Patient Outcomes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Unlocking the Potential of AI in EUS and ERCP: A Narrative Review for Pancreaticobiliary Disease.Cancers · 2025Review
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Urogynecology: Current Applications and Future Prospects.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- A decade of review in global regulation and research of artificial intelligence medical devices (2015-2025).Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Digital twins in healthcare: A systematic review of current applications, frameworks, and future directions.Digital healthReview
- Innovation trajectory of Software as a Medical Device: Evidence from the US FDA-approved products.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing integration of software in healthcare, particularly the rise of standalone software as a medical device (SaMD), is transforming digestive medicine, a field heavily reliant on medical imaging for both diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. This narrative review aims to explore the impact of SaMD on digestive healthcare, focusing on the evolution of these tools and their regulatory and ethical challenges. Our analysis highlights the exponential growth of SaMD in digestive healthcare, driven by the need for precise diagnostic tools and personalized treatment strategies. This rapid advancement, however, necessitates the parallel development of a robust regulatory framework to ensure SaMDs are transparent and deliver universal clinical benefits without the introduction of bias or harm. In addition, the discussion highlights the importance of adherence to the FAIR principles for data management-findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability. However, enhanced accessibility and interoperability require rigorous protocols to ensure compliance with data protection guidelines and adequate data security, both of which are crucial for effective integration of SaMDs into clinical workflows. In conclusion, while SaMDs hold significant promise for improving patients' outcomes in digestive medicine, their successful integration into clinical workflow depends on rigorous data protection protocols and clinical validation. Future directions include the need for adequate clinical and real-world studies to demonstrate that these devices are safe and well-suited to healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.