Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335779›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) in Digestive Healthcare: Regulatory Challenges and Ethical Implications.

Miguel Mascarenhas, Miguel Martins, Tiago Ribeiro, João Afonso, Pedro Cardoso, Francisco Mendes, Hélder Cardoso, Rute Almeida, João Ferreira, João Fonseca and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Miguel MascarenhasPrecision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0340-0830
Miguel MartinsPrecision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0484-4804
Tiago RibeiroPrecision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.
João AfonsoPrecision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.
Pedro CardosoPrecision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9427-5635
Francisco MendesPrecision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5890-7049
Hélder CardosoPrecision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.
Rute AlmeidaCINTESIS@RISE, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7755-5002
João FerreiraDepartment of Mechanic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering of University of Porto, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.
João FonsecaCINTESIS@RISE, Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0887-8796
Guilherme MacedoPrecision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200 427 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-9387-9872

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing integration of software in healthcare, particularly the rise of standalone software as a medical device (SaMD), is transforming digestive medicine, a field heavily reliant on medical imaging for both diagnosis and therapeutic interventions. This narrative review aims to explore the impact of SaMD on digestive healthcare, focusing on the evolution of these tools and their regulatory and ethical challenges. Our analysis highlights the exponential growth of SaMD in digestive healthcare, driven by the need for precise diagnostic tools and personalized treatment strategies. This rapid advancement, however, necessitates the parallel development of a robust regulatory framework to ensure SaMDs are transparent and deliver universal clinical benefits without the introduction of bias or harm. In addition, the discussion highlights the importance of adherence to the FAIR principles for data management-findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability. However, enhanced accessibility and interoperability require rigorous protocols to ensure compliance with data protection guidelines and adequate data security, both of which are crucial for effective integration of SaMDs into clinical workflows. In conclusion, while SaMDs hold significant promise for improving patients' outcomes in digestive medicine, their successful integration into clinical workflow depends on rigorous data protection protocols and clinical validation. Future directions include the need for adequate clinical and real-world studies to demonstrate that these devices are safe and well-suited to healthcare settings.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedigestive healthcaregastroenterologymedical devicesoftware

Identifiers

PMID39335779
PMCPMC11431531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.