ArticleBiomedicines2024
A Multiplexed Quantitative Proteomics Approach to the Human Plasma Protein Signature.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extracellular vesicle and particle biomarkers in cancer: a machine learning blueprint for liquid biopsy.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the plasma proteome being able to provide a unique insight into the health and disease status of individuals, holding singular promise as a source of protein biomarkers that could be pivotal in the context of personalized medicine, only around 100 proteins covering a few human conditions have been approved as biomarkers by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) so far. Mass spectrometry (MS) currently has enormous potential for high-throughput analysis in clinical research; however, plasma proteomics remains challenging mainly due to the wide dynamic range of plasma protein abundances and the time-consuming procedures required. We applied a new MS-based multiplexed proteomics workflow to quantitate proteins, encompassing 67 FDA-approved biomarkers, in >1300 human plasma samples from a clinical cohort. Our results indicate that this workflow is suitable for large-scale clinical studies, showing good accuracy and reproducibility (coefficient of variation (CV) < 20 for 90% of the proteins). Furthermore, we identified plasma signature proteins (stable in time on an individual basis), stable proteins (exhibiting low biological variability and high temporal stability), and highly variable proteins (with low temporal stability) that can be used for personalized health monitoring and medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.