ArticleBiomedicines2024
The Potential Diagnostic Utility of SMAD4 and ACCS in the Context of Inflammation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Incretin-based approaches for type 2 diabetes therapy: effects on circulating cytokines and adipocyte's secretome.BMC endocrine disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The search for new parameters for the prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or its harmful consequences remains an important field of study. Depending on the low-grade inflammatory nature of diabetes, we investigated three proteins in T2DM patients: 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase (ACCS), granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and Sma Mothers Against Decapentaplegic homolog-4 (SMAD4). In brief, sixty T2DM and thirty healthy controls had their serum levels of ACCS, G-CSF, SMAD4, and insulin tested using the ELISA method. The insulin resistance (IR) parameter (HOMA2IR), beta-cell function percentage (HOMA2%B), and insulin sensitivity (HOMA2%S) were all determined by the Homeostasis Model Assessment-2 (HOMA2) calculator. The predictability of these protein levels was investigated by neural network (NN) analysis and was associated with measures of IR. Based on the results, ACCS, G-CSF, and SMAD4 increased significantly in the T2DM group compared with the controls. Their levels depend on IR status and inflammation. The multivariate GLM indicated the independence of the levels of these proteins on the covariates or drugs taken. The receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) for the prediction of T2DM using NN analysis is 0.902, with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 93.8%. The network predicts T2DM well with predicted pseudoprobabilities over 0.5. The model's predictive capability (normalized importance) revealed that ACCS is the best model (100%) for the prediction of T2DM, followed by G-CSF (75.5%) and SMAD4 (69.6%). It can be concluded that ACCS, G-CSF, and SMAD4 are important proteins in T2DM prediction, and their increase is associated with the presence of inflammation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.