Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335487›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Investigation of Type A Aortic Dissection Using Computational Modelling.

Mohammad Al-Rawi, Djelloul Belkacemi, Eric T A Lim, Manar Khashram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad Al-RawiCenter for Engineering and Industrial Design (CEID), Waikato Institute of Technology (Wintec), Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5794-6871
Djelloul BelkacemiUnité de Développement des Equipements Solaires UDES, EPST Centre de Développement des Energies Renouvelables (CDER), Bousmail, Tipaza 42415, Algeria.ORCID 0000-0003-0726-3439
Eric T A LimDepartment of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton 3204, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4101-9341
Manar KhashramDepartment of Vascular & Endovascular Surgery, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton 3204, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4921-8433

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic dissection is a catastrophic failure of the endothelial wall that could lead to malperfusion or rupture. Computational modelling tools may help detect arterial damage. Technological advancements have led to more sophisticated forms of modelling being made available to low-grade computers. These devices can create 3D models with clinical data, where the clinical blood pressure waveforms' model can be used to form boundary conditions for assessing hemodynamic parameters, modelling blood flow propagation along the aorta to predict the development of cardiovascular disease. This study presents patient-specific data for a rare case of severe Type A aortic dissection. CT scan images were taken nine months apart, consisting of the artery both before and after dissection. The results for the pre-dissection CT showed that the pressure waveform at the ascending aorta was higher, and the systolic pressure was lagging at the descending aorta. For the post-dissection analysis, we observed the same outcome; however, the amplitude for the waveform (systolic pressure) at the ascending aorta increased in the false lumen by 25% compared to the true lumen by 3%. Also, the waveform peak (systolic) was leading by 0.01 s. The hemodynamic parameter of wall shear stress (WSS) predicted the aneurysm's existence at the ascending aorta, as well as potential aortic dissection. The high WSS contours were located at the tear location at the peak blood flow of 0.14 s, which shows the potential of this tool for earlier diagnosis of aortic dissection.

Indexed as

aortic dissectioncomputational modellingendothelial cell activation potential (ECAP)wall shear stress (WSS)

Identifiers

PMID39335487
PMCPMC11428704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.