ArticleBiomedicines2024
Investigation of Type A Aortic Dissection Using Computational Modelling.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of Computational Modeling in Reassessing the Threshold for Intervention and Progression into Type A Aortic Dissection.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Ascending Aortic Aneurysms: From Pathophysiology to Surgical Repair.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Computational Modeling Approach to Profile Hemodynamical Behavior in a Healthy Aorta.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic dissection is a catastrophic failure of the endothelial wall that could lead to malperfusion or rupture. Computational modelling tools may help detect arterial damage. Technological advancements have led to more sophisticated forms of modelling being made available to low-grade computers. These devices can create 3D models with clinical data, where the clinical blood pressure waveforms' model can be used to form boundary conditions for assessing hemodynamic parameters, modelling blood flow propagation along the aorta to predict the development of cardiovascular disease. This study presents patient-specific data for a rare case of severe Type A aortic dissection. CT scan images were taken nine months apart, consisting of the artery both before and after dissection. The results for the pre-dissection CT showed that the pressure waveform at the ascending aorta was higher, and the systolic pressure was lagging at the descending aorta. For the post-dissection analysis, we observed the same outcome; however, the amplitude for the waveform (systolic pressure) at the ascending aorta increased in the false lumen by 25% compared to the true lumen by 3%. Also, the waveform peak (systolic) was leading by 0.01 s. The hemodynamic parameter of wall shear stress (WSS) predicted the aneurysm's existence at the ascending aorta, as well as potential aortic dissection. The high WSS contours were located at the tear location at the peak blood flow of 0.14 s, which shows the potential of this tool for earlier diagnosis of aortic dissection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.