ArticleBiomedicines2024
Development and Validation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Colorectal Polyps Based on Electronic Health Records.
Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an Interpretable Triage Tool for Colorectal Polyp Risk Stratification Within a Population-Based Screening Program: Machine Learning Approach.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Association between serum lipids and colorectal polyps: a retrospective cross-sectional study.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Histopathological Classification in Colorectal Polyps.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Machine learning in colorectal polyp surveillance: A paradigm shift in post-endoscopic mucosal resection follow-up.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Random forests algorithm using basic medical data for predicting the presence of colonic polyps.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of optimized logistic regression with state-of-the-art models for complex gastroenterological image analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColorectal Polyps are the main source of precancerous lesions in colorectal cancer. To increase the early diagnosis of tumors and improve their screening, we aimed to develop a simple and non-invasive diagnostic prediction model for colorectal polyps based on machine learning (ML) and using accessible health examination records.
methodsWe conducted a single-center observational retrospective study in China. The derivation cohort, consisting of 5426 individuals who underwent colonoscopy screening from January 2021 to January 2024, was separated for training (cohort 1) and validation (cohort 2). The variables considered in this study included demographic data, vital signs, and laboratory results recorded by health examination records. With features selected by univariate analysis and Lasso regression analysis, nine machine learning methods were utilized to develop a colorectal polyp diagnostic model. Several evaluation indexes, including the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), were used to compare the predictive performance. The SHapley additive explanation method (SHAP) was used to rank the feature importance and explain the final model.
results14 independent predictors were identified as the most valuable features to establish the models. The adaptive boosting machine (AdaBoost) model exhibited the best performance among the 9 ML models in cohort 1, with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, F1 score, and AUC (95% CI) of 0.632 (0.618-0.646), 0.635 (0.550-0.721), 0.674 (0.591-0.758), 0.593 (0.576-0.611), 0.673 (0.654-0.691), 0.608 (0.560-0.655) and 0.687 (0.626-0.749), respectively. The final model gave an AUC of 0.675 in cohort 2. Additionally, the precision recall (PR) curve for the AdaBoost model reached the highest AUPR of 0.648, positioning it nearest to the upper right corner. SHAP analysis provided visualized explanations, reaffirming the critical factors associated with the risk of colorectal polyps in the asymptomatic population.
conclusionsThis study integrated the clinical and laboratory indicators with machine learning techniques to establish the predictive model for colorectal polyps, providing non-invasive, cost-effective screening strategies for asymptomatic individuals and guiding decisions for further examination and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.