Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335452›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2024

Prior Appendicectomy and Gut Microbiota Re-Establishment in Adults after Bowel Preparation and Colonoscopy.

Amelia J McGuinness, Martin O'Hely, Douglas Stupart, David Watters, Samantha L Dawson, Christopher Hair, Michael Berk, Mohammadreza Mohebbi, Amy Loughman, Glenn Guest and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07439640 (Clinical Experimental Study on the Impact of PEG Laxatives for Intestinal Preparation on Gut Microbiota in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07439640 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Experimental Study on the Impact of PEG Laxatives for Intestinal Preparation on Gut Microbiota in Patients Undergoing Cholecystectomy

TypeobservationalSponsorTongji HospitalRan2025 to 2027Enrolled20ConditionsCholecystectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Amelia J McGuinnessThe Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine and Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3252-5824
Martin O'HelyThe Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine and Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0212-1207
Douglas StupartSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
David WattersSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Samantha L DawsonThe Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine and Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4701-1220
Christopher HairSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Michael BerkThe Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine and Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Mohammadreza MohebbiBiostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9713-7211
Amy LoughmanThe Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine and Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Glenn GuestSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.
Felice N JackaThe Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation (IMPACT), School of Medicine and Barwon Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9825-0328

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence suggests that the human vermiform appendix is not a vestigial organ but rather an immunological organ of biological relevance. It is hypothesised that the appendix acts as a bacterial 'safe house' for commensal gut bacteria and facilitates re-inoculation of the colon after disruption through the release of biofilms. To date, no studies have attempted to explore this potential mechanistic function of the appendix. We conducted a pre-post intervention study in adults (n = 59) exploring re-establishment of the gut microbiota in those with and without an appendix after colonic disruption via bowel preparation and colonoscopy. Gut microbiota composition was measured one week before and one month after bowel preparation and colonoscopy using 16S rRNA sequencing. We observed between group differences in gut microbiota composition between those with (n = 45) and without (n = 13) an appendix at baseline. These differences were no longer evident one-month post-procedure, suggesting that this procedure may have 'reset' any potential appendix-related differences between groups. Both groups experienced reductions in gut microbiota richness and shifts in beta diversity post-procedure, with greater changes in those without an appendix, and there were five bacterial genera whose re-establishment post-procedure appeared to be moderated by appendicectomy status. This small experimental study provides preliminary evidence of a potential differential re-establishment of the gut microbiota after disruption in those with and without an appendix, warranting further investigation into the potential role of the appendix as a microbial safe house.

Indexed as

appendectomyappendicectomyappendixbowel preparationcolonoscopygut microbiota

Identifiers

PMID39335452
PMCPMC11429235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.