ReviewCancers2024
Advancing Cholangiocarcinoma Care: Insights and Innovations in T Cell Therapy.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers for early detection of gastrointestinal cancers: Current landscape and emerging technologies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Integrative Sequencing and Proteogenomic Approaches to Intratumoral Heterogeneity in Cholangiocarcinoma: Implications for Precision Diagnosis and Therapy.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Harnessing cellular immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: an integrated roadmap for overcoming resistance.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- FGFR Aberrations in Solid Tumors: Mechanistic Insights and Clinical Translation of Targeted Therapies.Cancers · 2025Review
- MUC1 promoter methylation pattern diversity and its association with TET3 expression and prognosis in cholangiocarcinoma.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Programmed cell death in triple-negative breast cancer.Cellular & molecular biology letters · 2025Review
- Aberrant ALPP Expression Serves as a Prognostic Biomarker and Facilitates Cholangiocarcinoma Progression through Immune Evasion and PI3K-Akt Signaling Activation.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Research progress of T cells in cholangiocarcinoma.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Review
- Research hotspots and trends in immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2023).Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare and aggressive malignancy originating from the bile ducts, with poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Traditional therapies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, have shown limited efficacy, especially in advanced cases. Recent advancements in immunotherapy, particularly T cell-based therapies like chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), and T cell receptor (TCR)-based therapies, have opened new avenues for improving outcomes in CCA. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of T cell therapies for CCA, focusing on CAR T cell therapy. It highlights key challenges, including the complex tumor microenvironment and immune evasion mechanisms, and the progress made in preclinical and clinical trials. The review also discusses ongoing clinical trials targeting specific CCA antigens, such as MUC1, EGFR, and CD133, and the evolving role of precision immunotherapy in enhancing treatment outcomes. Despite significant progress, further research is needed to optimize these therapies for solid tumors like CCA. By summarizing the most recent clinical results and future directions, this review underscores the promising potential of T cell therapies in revolutionizing CCA treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.