ArticleCancers2024
Comparative Efficacy of 21 Treatment Strategies for Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of POLE2/GINS1-mediated AKT/mTOR pathway in RCC autophagy, proliferation, and metastasis: evidences from bioinformatic, clinical, and experimental data.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Article
- Impact of first-line dual immuno-oncology combination therapy versus immuno-oncology plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor on outcomes of second-line VEGFR-TKI in advanced RCC: a real-world multi-institutional analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The primary treatment for operable pancreatic cancer (PC) involves surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. Nevertheless, perioperative or neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) may be used to mitigate the likelihood of recurrence and mortality. This network meta-analysis (NMA) assesses the comparative efficacy of various treatment approaches for resectable PC. A thorough search was carried out on January 31, 2023, encompassing PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. We incorporated randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that compared surgical interventions with or without (neo)adjuvant or perioperative therapies for operable PC. We conducted a fixed-effects Bayesian NMA. We presented the effect sizes in terms of hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) along with 95% credible intervals (95% CrIs). The treatment was deemed statistically superior when the 95% credible interval (CrI) did not encompass a null value (hazard ratio < 1). Treatment rankings were established based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). A total of 24 studies were incorporated, comparing 21 treatments with surgery in isolation. Eleven treatments showed superior efficacy compared to surgery alone, with HRs ranging from 0.38 for perioperative treatments to 0.73 for adjuvant 5-fluorouracil. After the exclusion of studies conducted in Asia, it was found that the perioperative regimen of gemcitabine combined with nab-paclitaxel was the most effective regimen (SUCRA,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.