ArticleCancers2024
Real-World Impact of Deep Targeted Sequencing on Erythrocytosis and Thrombocytosis Diagnosis: A Reference Centre Experience.
Article in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite advances in diagnosis of erythrocytosis and thrombocytosis due to driver mutation testing, many cases remain classified as "idiopathic". This can be explained by the absence of an evident secondary cause, inconclusive bone marrow biopsy or neglection of family history. Analysis of a broad panel of genes through next-generation sequencing (NGS) could improve diagnostic work-up identifying underlying genetic causes. We reviewed the results of NGS performed in our laboratory and its diagnostic impact on 117 patients with unexplained erythrocytosis and 58 with unexplained thrombocytosis; six patients (5.1%) were diagnosed with polycythaemia vera (PV) and 8 (6.8%) with familial erythrocytosis after NGS testing. Low EPO and a family history seemed to predict a positive result, respectively. However, a greater percentage of patients were ultimately diagnosed with secondary erythrocytosis (36%), remained as idiopathic (28.2%) or were self-limited (15%). The yield of NGS was shown to be slightly higher in patients with thrombocytosis, as 15 (25.9%) were diagnosed with essential thrombocythemia (ET) or familial thrombocytosis after variant detection; previous research has shown similar results, but most of them carried out NGS retrospectively, while the present study exhibits the performance of this test in a real-world setting. Overall, the low rate of variant detection and its poor impact on diagnostic work-up highlights the need for a thorough screening prior to NGS, in order to improve its yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.