Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335111›Full record

ReviewCancers2024

Receptors and Host Factors for Enterovirus Infection: Implications for Cancer Therapy.

Olga N Alekseeva, Le T Hoa, Pavel O Vorobyev, Dmitriy V Kochetkov, Yana D Gumennaya, Elizaveta R Naberezhnaya, Denis O Chuvashov, Alexander V Ivanov, Peter M Chumakov, Anastasia V Lipatova

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. An integrated microfluidic culture model for photodynamic therapy evaluations under normoxic and hypoxic conditions.Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olga N AlekseevaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3910-466X
Le T HoaDepartment of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.
Pavel O VorobyevEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-7567-913X
Dmitriy V KochetkovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Yana D GumennayaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-5502-0676
Elizaveta R NaberezhnayaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Denis O ChuvashovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.
Alexander V IvanovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5659-9679
Peter M ChumakovEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-8078-2908
Anastasia V LipatovaEngelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119991 Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 19-74-10086Russian Science Foundation 23-14-00370
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enteroviruses, with their diverse clinical manifestations ranging from mild or asymptomatic infections to severe diseases such as poliomyelitis and viral myocarditis, present a public health threat. However, they can also be used as oncolytic agents. This review shows the intricate relationship between enteroviruses and host cell factors. Enteroviruses utilize specific receptors and coreceptors for cell entry that are critical for infection and subsequent viral replication. These receptors, many of which are glycoproteins, facilitate virus binding, capsid destabilization, and internalization into cells, and their expression defines virus tropism towards various types of cells. Since enteroviruses can exploit different receptors, they have high oncolytic potential for personalized cancer therapy, as exemplified by the antitumor activity of certain enterovirus strains including the bioselected non-pathogenic Echovirus type 7/Rigvir, approved for melanoma treatment. Dissecting the roles of individual receptors in the entry of enteroviruses can provide valuable insights into their potential in cancer therapy. This review discusses the application of gene-targeting techniques such as CRISPR/Cas9 technology to investigate the impact of the loss of a particular receptor on the attachment of the virus and its subsequent internalization. It also summarizes the data on their expression in various types of cancer. By understanding how enteroviruses interact with specific cellular receptors, researchers can develop more effective regimens of treatment, offering hope for more targeted and efficient therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

coxsackievirusCRISPR/Cas9 technologyechovirusenterovirusoncolytic virusviral receptors

Identifiers

PMID39335111
PMCPMC11430599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.