ReviewCancers2024
Conjunctival Melanoma: A Clinical Review and Update.
Review in Cancers, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Ocular Surface Tumors: Current Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Metastatic disease in conjunctival malignant melanoma: a retrospective analysis of 167 cases.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Precision Oncology in Ocular Melanoma: Integrating Molecular and Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Clinicopathological Profile of Conjunctival Melanoma at a Referral Ophthalmology Center in Peru.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Review
- Subepithelial Lesions of the Ocular Surface: A Review.Current ophthalmology reports · 2025Review
- Local Control of Conjunctival Malignant Melanoma by Proton Beam Therapy in a Patient With No Metastasis in Six Years FromJournal of medical cases · 2025Article
- Conjunctival melanoma: comprehensive insights into clinical features, genetic alterations, and modern treatment approaches.Pathology oncology research : POR · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conjunctival melanoma (Co-M) is an aggressive, invasive eye and eyelid cancer. Its global incidence of ~1 in a million is increasing at a rate ratio of ~1.4, but this rises sharply in over 65-year-olds. Although rare, Co-M has a devastating impact on the lives of those who develop it. Co-M is often misdiagnosed or overlooked, leading to vision loss either from the destructive effects of the tumour or side effects of therapy, facial disfigurement from radical surgery, and death from metastases. Due to its rarity, there is limited evidence for diagnosis and management; hence, there is no standardised treatment and not all cases are referred to a specialised ocular oncology centre. Recent progress in cancer immunology and genetics have revolutionised the treatment of cutaneous melanomas, which share some similarities to Co-M. Importantly, a better understanding of Co-M and its precursor lesions is urgently needed to lead to the development of novel targeted and immunotherapies both for local tumour control and disseminated disease. This review aims to provide a comprehensive clinical overview of the current knowledge regarding Co-M, its epidemiology, pathogenesis, presentation, diagnosis and recent changes in the classification of its precursor lesions, management, and recent advances in novel biological therapies for personalised treatment of this disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.