Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335067›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Appropriate Use of Antibiotics in Acute Pancreatitis: A Scoping Review.

Josep M Badia, Sara Amador, Carmen González-Sánchez, Inés Rubio-Pérez, Alba Manuel-Vázquez, Montserrat Juvany, Estela Membrilla, José M Balibrea, Xavier Guirao

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Josep M BadiaDepartment of Surgery, Hospital General Granollers, School of Medicine, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Av Francesc Ribas 1, 08402 Granollers, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2928-5233
Sara AmadorDepartment of Surgery, Hospital General Granollers, School of Medicine, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Av Francesc Ribas 1, 08402 Granollers, Spain.
Carmen González-SánchezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5422-7820
Inés Rubio-PérezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Alba Manuel-VázquezDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, 28905 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-0274
Montserrat JuvanyDepartment of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
Estela MembrillaDepartment of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.
José M BalibreaDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias, 08916 Badalona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0764-7179
Xavier GuiraoDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí, 08208 Sabadell, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9201-7851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile selective use of antibiotics for infected pancreatic necrosis (IPN) in acute pancreatitis (AP) is recommended, studies indicate a high rate of inadequate treatment.

methodsA search of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was conducted, focusing on primary research and meta-analyses. Data were categorized based on core concepts, and a narrative synthesis was performed.

resultsThe search identified a total of 1016 publications. After evaluating 203 full texts and additional sources from the grey literature, 80 studies were included in the review. The answers obtained were: (1) Preventive treatment does not decrease the incidence of IPN or mortality. Given the risks of bacterial resistance and fungal infections, antibiotics should be reserved for highly suspected or confirmed IPN; (2) The diagnosis of IPN does not always require microbiological samples, as clinical suspicion or computed tomography signs can suffice. Early diagnosis and treatment may be improved by using biomarkers such as procalcitonin and novel microbiological methods; (3) When indicated, early initiation of antibiotics is a key determinant in reducing mortality associated with IPN; (4) Antibiotics with good penetration into pancreatic tissue covering Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria should be used. Routine antifungal therapy is not recommended; (5) The step-up approach, including antibiotics, is the standard for IPN management; (6) Antibiotic duration should be kept to a minimum and should be based on the quality of source control and patient condition.

conclusionsEarly antibiotic therapy is essential for the treatment of IPN, but prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended in AP. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to better understand the role of antibiotics and antifungals in AP management.

Indexed as

acute pancreatitisantibioticsduration of treatmentinfected pancreatic necrosismicrobiologyprophylactic therapy

Identifiers

PMID39335067
PMCPMC11428601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.