Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39335026›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Antimicrobial Resistance and Use on Chinese Dairy Farms: Awareness and Opinions Regarding Selective Treatments of Farm Managers.

Yindi Xiong, Herman W Barkema, Jingyue Yang, John P Kastelic, Diego B Nobrega, Xiaoping Li, Xiaofang Tong, Zhenying Fan, Jian Gao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Multidrug-resistant mammary pathogenicFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yindi XiongCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4708-3133
Herman W BarkemaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9678-8378
Jingyue YangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
John P KastelicFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4607-3355
Diego B NobregaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9821-1436
Xiaoping LiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Xiaofang TongCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Zhenying FanXianwei CARE Technology Platform, Beijing 100191, China.
Jian GaoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32273082
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn China's expanding dairy industry, a lack of oversight regarding antimicrobial use and increasing antimicrobial resistance are evident. Selective treatments of dairy cows for clinical mastitis or dry cow therapy are proposed to promote judicious antimicrobial use without adversely impacting cattle health. These approaches have been successfully implemented on farms in other countries.

methodsOn 28 October 2023, a 2-day in-person seminar was held in Beijing, China, on selective antimicrobial treatments of dairy cows for clinical mastitis or dry cow therapy on large Chinese dairy farms. Concurrently, a qualitative study involving 15 technical managers from the 13 largest Chinese dairy groups used focus group discussions and questionnaires to explore perspectives on selective treatments of dairy cows for clinical mastitis or dry cow therapy. The main outcomes assessed were opinions and concerns regarding implementing selective antimicrobial treatments.

resultsAlthough there was diversity of cognition on AMR and selective treatments, the technical managers were generally positive regarding adoption of selective treatments. However, they expressed a need for more evidence and tools, including anticipated economic impacts, effects of delaying treatment until diagnosis, accurate interpretation of milk recording data, safe use of internal teat sealants, and spread of pathogens. Participants stressed the need for awareness, staff training, farm management, and China-specific standards, suggesting large-scale trials to assess efficacy of selective treatments.

conclusionThe findings revealed key challenges and barriers currently impeding selective AMU practices. These insights could inform efforts to promote judicious AMU on farms through targeted treatment regimens, reducing mounting selective pressure driving resistance.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial stewardshipclinical mastitisdairy farmsdry cow therapy

Identifiers

PMID39335026
PMCPMC11429497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.