Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334939›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2024

DNA Adductomics: A Narrative Review of Its Development, Applications, and Future.

Mengqiu Cao, Xinyu Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mengqiu CaoSchool of Public Health, Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.
Xinyu ZhangSchool of Public Health, Hongqiao International Institute of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3472-8393

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China 21976120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA adductomics is the global study of all DNA adducts and was first proposed in 2006 by the Matsuda group. Its development has been greatly credited to the advances in mass spectrometric techniques, particularly tandem and multiple-stage mass spectrometry. In fact, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based methods are virtually the sole technique with practicality for DNA adductomic studies to date. At present, DNA adductomics is primarily used as a tool to search for DNA adducts, known and unknown, providing evidence for exposure to exogenous genotoxins and/or for the molecular mechanisms of their genotoxicity. Some DNA adducts discovered in this way have the potential to predict cancer risks and/or to be associated with adverse health outcomes. DNA adductomics has been successfully used to identify and determine exogenous carcinogens that may contribute to the etiology of certain cancers, including bacterial genotoxins and an

Indexed as

DNA AdductsAnimalsChromatography, LiquidHumansMass SpectrometryNeoplasmsDNA AdductsbiomarkersdetectionDNA adductomicsLC-MS/MS

Identifiers

PMID39334939
PMCPMC11430648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.