ArticleBiomolecules2024
Impact of Multi-Factor Features on Protein Secondary Structure Prediction.
Article in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- TruMPET: A New Method for Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Using Neural Networks Trained on Multiple Pre-Selected Physicochemical and Structural Features.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- AAindexNC: Estimating the Physicochemical Properties of Non-Canonical Amino Acids, Including Those Derived from the PDB and PDBeChem Databank.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Twenty years of advances in prediction of nucleic acid-binding residues in protein sequences.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protein secondary structure prediction (PSSP) plays a crucial role in resolving protein functions and properties. Significant progress has been made in this field in recent years, and the use of a variety of protein-related features, including amino acid sequences, position-specific score matrices (PSSM), amino acid properties, and secondary structure trend factors, to improve prediction accuracy is an important technical route for it. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of these factor features in secondary structure prediction is lacking in the current work. This study quantitatively analyzes the impact of several major factors on secondary structure prediction models using a more explanatory four-class machine learning approach. The applicability of each factor in the different types of methods, the extent to which the different methods work on each factor, and the evaluation of the effect of multi-factor combinations are explored in detail. Through experiments and analyses, it was found that PSSM performs best in methods with strong high-dimensional features and complex feature extraction capabilities, while amino acid sequences, although performing poorly overall, perform relatively well in methods with strong linear processing capabilities. Also, the combination of amino acid properties and trend factors significantly improved the prediction performance. This study provides empirical evidence for future researchers to optimize multi-factor feature combinations and apply them to protein secondary structure prediction models, which is beneficial in further optimizing the use of these factors to enhance the performance of protein secondary structure prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.