ArticleBiomolecules2024
Membrane Activity of Melittin and Magainin-I at Low Peptide-to-Lipid Ratio: Different Types of Pores and Translocation Mechanisms.
Article in Biomolecules, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Dual Role of Natural Peptides in Cancer Therapy: Anticancer and Immunomodulatory Perspectives.Oncology research · 2026Review
- Enhanced antibacterial activity of antimicrobial peptide-antibiotic combinations against multidrug-resistant bacteria.FEMS microbes · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are believed to be a prominent alternative to the common antibiotics. However, despite decades of research, there are still no good clinical examples of peptide-based antimicrobial drugs for system application. The main reasons are loss of activity in the human body, cytotoxicity, and low selectivity. To overcome these challenges, a well-established structure-function relationship for AMPs is critical. In the present study, we focused on the well-known examples of melittin and magainin to investigate in detail the initial stages of AMP interaction with lipid membranes at low peptide-to-lipid ratio. By combining the patch-clamp technique with the bioelectrochemical method of intramembrane field compensation, we showed that these peptides interact with the membrane in different ways: melittin inserts deeper into the lipid bilayer than magainin. This difference led to diversity in pore formation. While magainin, after a threshold concentration, formed the well-known toroidal pores, allowing the translocation of the peptide through the membrane, melittin probably induced predominantly pure lipidic pores with a very low rate of peptide translocation. Thus, our results shed light on the early stages of peptide-membrane interactions and suggest new insights into the structure-function relationship of AMPs based on the depth of their membrane insertion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.