Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334799›Full record

ArticleAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Exogenous Ergothioneine and Glutathione Limit Postharvest Senescence of Arugula.

Dhanya Sivakumar, Gale Bozzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dhanya SivakumarDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.
Gale BozzoDepartment of Plant Agriculture, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0609-5031

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ALLRP 560281-20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arugula is susceptible to postharvest deterioration. We tested the impact of exogenous antioxidant (i.e., ergothioneine and glutathione) dip solutions on arugula quality during storage at 4 °C or 10 °C for up to 17 days relative to a non-antioxidant treatment. Leaves from each dip treatment and storage temperature were assessed for visual quality and endogenous antioxidant metabolite profiles. Overall, leaf discolouration, wilting, and decay were more rapid at 10 °C than at 4 °C. Both antioxidant treatments limited leaf discolouration at 4 °C. Exogenous ergothioneine reduced wilting at 4 °C, whereas exogenous glutathione limited the incidence of leaf decay. At 10 °C, glutathione reduced the incidence of discolouration and decay, whereas both antioxidant dip treatments limited the decline in leaf yellowing. Ergothioneine was solely detected in ergothioneine-treated leaves; a decrease occurred within the first two days of storage but was unchanged thereafter. Although both antioxidant treatments did not affect endogenous glutathione concentrations at either storage temperature, glutathione disulfide was stable within the glutathione-treated leaves, whereas it increased in the other treatments. Ascorbate degradation was delayed in ergothioneine-treated leaves at 4 °C relative to all other treatments, whereas both antioxidant treatments little affected ascorbate metabolism in leaves stored at 10 °C.

Indexed as

arugulaascorbateergothioneineglutathionepostharvestsenescence

Identifiers

PMID39334799
PMCPMC11429341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.