ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Adapting Child Development Assessment Tools to the Rural Indian Context.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptation and Implementation of the Global Scales for Early Development (GSED) Tool in Ethiopia.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChild development assessment tests serve many purposes, including educational placement, identifying cognitive weaknesses, and initiating early interventions. Much of the research associated with developmental testing has been conducted in high-income countries, offering limited guidance on adapting these tests to other settings.
objectivesAs part of the first phase of a study exploring the impact of childhood vaccines on cognition and school attainment, we aimed to assess the feasibility of enrolling children from the community, documenting immunization, and conducting child development assessments for children between 18 months and 8 years of age in a rural setting in Haryana, India.
methodsTo ensure assessments are optimally tailored to the context, child development assessment tests require valid translation and cultural adaptation. This report describes the rigorous seven-step adaptation process we designed for the contextually appropriate adaptation of the following three child development assessment tests: the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-IV, the Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale Fifth Ed. for Early Childhood, and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children IV.
resultsThis process involved translating tests into the local language, back-translating them for accuracy, adapting them to the rural context via several iterations, and field-testing to refine and validate adaptation quality.
conclusionsThis adaptation process may be beneficial for other researchers involved in adapting child development assessment tests to other settings. Further, this adaptation process may inform other researchers involved in adapting tests for diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.