ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Ultrasound Diagnosis of Clavicle Fractures in Newborns: A Systematic Review.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of ultrasound for clavicle fractures in emergency settings: A meta-analysis and systematic review.The Journal of international medical research · 2025Pooled it
- The clinical efficacy analysis of ultrasound-assisted minimally invasive treatment for Jakob Type II humeral lateral condyle fractures in children.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Birth-related long bone fractures in otherwise healthy newborns and medical professional liability: literature review and case presentation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFractures of the clavicle are the most common birth injury among newborns. Aim of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive analysis of the role of ultrasound (US) in diagnosing clavicular fractures in neonates.
methodsA systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using PubMed and Embase, including studies focusing on US in neonatal clavicle fracture. Age at US, number of cases examined by US and X-ray, US and X-ray diagnoses, US probe used, fracture site were systematically extracted.
resultsA total of 231 articles were found. We ultimately selected 7 publications that satisfied the inclusion criteria, involving 136 patients examined between 3 days and 3 weeks of age, with 135 confirmed fractures. US was performed on all patients and correctly diagnosed all fractures (135/135, 100%). X-ray was performed on 94/136 patients (69.1%) and correctly diagnosed 89/93 fractures (95.7%). Fracture site was: medial in 2/79, middle in 37/79, and lateral in 40/79. In the remaining 57 cases, site was not reported.
conclusionsThis review indicates that ultrasound is extremely reliable in diagnosing clavicle fractures in newborns and should be considered as the gold standard in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.