ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Dronabinol Is Not a Game Changer in Pediatric Palliative Care: Results from a Retrospective Study.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesPatients with life-limiting conditions (LLCs) often suffer from restlessness, spasticity, pain, and seizures. Dronabinol (DRB) may have a relieving effect; however, data on the effectiveness of DRB in children with LLCs are limited to outpatients. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of DRB.
methodsRetrospective analysis of inpatients.
resultsFrom 2011 to 2021, 1219 patients were admitted. Of these, 63 patients (63.5% male, age: 10.4 (SD = 6.3) years) were treated with DRB; 96.8% had a neurological disease, and 26 patients were started on DRB (group A), while 37 were admitted with existing DRB (group B). The effective doses were 0.21 (SD = 0.11) in group A and 0.48 (SD = 0.5) mg/kg/BW/day in group B (
conclusionsSubjective positive effects could not be confirmed by more objective data. Side effects can be severe. Thus, DRB should be started in a well-monitored setting and only with clear indications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.