Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334564›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical nursing2025

The Transition of Care Between Emergency Department and Primary Care: An Integrative Systematic Review.

Kathleen Hain, Jennie M Scarvell, Catherine Paterson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kathleen HainUniversity of Canberra, Faculty of Health, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Jennie M ScarvellUniversity of Canberra, Faculty of Health, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Catherine PatersonUniversity of Canberra, Faculty of Health, Bruce, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1249-6782

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo identify the barriers and enablers of effective transitions of care between the emergency department and primary care providers.

backgroundSuccessful patient care transitions from the emergency department to primary care providers are important because this process has implications for the quality, patient safety, and cost of patient care. Failure in follow-up consultations with primary care can result in representations to the emergency department, which can impact negative emergency department operational issues throughout the entire hospital. DESIGN AND

methodsAn integrative systematic review was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. The reviewers followed a systematic review protocol registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022316165). A search strategy was applied to extract articles from included databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Scopus, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health databases. Articles were assessed using a predetermined eligibility criterion. Quality assessment and a narrative synthesis were conducted.

resultsOf the 1200 articles screened, 25 studies were included. Four additional articles were identified from reference lists. The range of study designs included: four qualitative, three mixed methods and 22 quantitative studies. A total of 291,012 patients were represented. Successful care transition was enhanced by access to insurance, ease of payment methods, effective communication, prior booked primary care provider appointments and access to transportation. Many patients experienced financial toxicity, and the shortfall between fees charged and rebates provided was found to influence primary care provider follow-up compliance.

conclusionFuture recommendations to provide safe and effective transitions of care would be to optimise supported self-management for patients and deliver timely and clear communication with standardised discharge documentation to be shared between the emergency department and primary care providers. RELEVANCE FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE: There is no one-size-fits-all approach to delivering safe care transitions between emergency department and primary care providers, and future research should target high-risk groups.

trial registrationProspero: CRD42022316165.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareEmergency Service, HospitalPrimary Health CareHumanscareemergency departmentprimary caresystematic reviewtransition

Identifiers

PMID39334564
PMCPMC11933523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.