Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334511›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Variable and dynamic associations between hot weather, thermal comfort, and individuals' emotional states during summertime.

Kimberly L Meidenbauer, Kathryn E Schertz, Peiyuan Li, Ashish Sharma, Tiara R Freeman, Elizabeth A Janey, Andrew J Stier, Anya L Samtani, Kathryn Gehrke, Marc G Berman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Changes in the thermal stress across Europe between 1940-2023.International journal of biometeorology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kimberly L MeidenbauerDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University, P.O. Box 664820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA. k.meidenbauer@wsu.edu.
Kathryn E SchertzDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Peiyuan LiDiscovery Partners Institute, University of Illinois System, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ashish SharmaDiscovery Partners Institute, University of Illinois System, Chicago, IL, USA.
Tiara R FreemanDepartment of Psychology, Washington State University, P.O. Box 664820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA.
Elizabeth A JaneyDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Andrew J StierDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Anya L SamtaniDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Kathryn GehrkeDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marc G BermanDepartment of Psychology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Pilot Program CoreP30ES027792 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Gokhan M. Mutlu, Gail S Prins · 2017 to 2026
$13.6M
NASA 80NSSC22K1683National Science Foundation 1952050National Science Foundation 2139316National Science Foundation 2324642NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES027792U.S. Department of Energy DE-AC02- 06CH11357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of heat exposure on negative affect are thought to be central to the observed relationships between hot summer days and deleterious outcomes, such as violent crime or mental health crises. As these relationships are likely to be magnified by the effects of climate change, a better understanding of how consistent or variable the effects of hot weather on affective states is required. The current work combines data gathered from an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) study on individuals' thermal perceptions, comfort, and affective states in outdoor environments during their daily lives with high spatiotemporal resolution climate-modeled weather variables. Using these data, associations between objective weather variables (temperature, humidity, etc.), perceived heat (thermal perception and comfort), and affective states are examined. Overall, objective weather data reasonably predicted perception and comfort, but only comfort predicted negative affective states. The variance explained across individuals was generally very low in predicting negative affect or comfort, but within-person variance explained was high. In other words, while there may be a relatively consistent relationship between temperature and psychological experience for any given person, there are significant individual differences across people. Age and gender were examined as moderators of these relationships, and while gender had no impact, participant age showed several significant interactions. Specifically, while older adults tended to experience more thermal discomfort and perceived higher temperatures as hotter, the relationship between discomfort and negative affect was lower in older adults. Taken together, these results emphasize the importance of thermal discomfort specifically in predicting negative affect, as well as the high inter-individual variability in thermal perceptions and comfort for the same ambient temperatures.

Indexed as

EmotionsHot TemperatureSeasonsThermosensingAdolescentAdultAffectAgedClimate ChangeEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedWeatherYoung AdultAffectEcological momentary assessmentHeatThermal discomfort

Identifiers

PMID39334511
PMCPMC11438364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.