ArticlePorcine health management2024
Assessment of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) farm surface contamination through environmental sampling.
Article in Porcine health management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis on the diagnostic accuracy of various detection methods for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus.Porcine health management · 2026Article
- Determining farm surface porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) contamination through viability RT-qPCR.PloS one · 2026Article
- Effect of temperature, relative humidity, and time on the detection of swine RNA viruses (PRRSV, PEDV, IAV) inoculated onto filter papers.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Copper-Silver Nanoparticle/Lipase Nanobiohybrids for Enhanced Activity Against Viral Pathogens.ACS applied nano materials · 2025Article
- Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Prevalence and Pathogenicity of One NADC34-like Virus Isolate Circulating in China.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Comparison of the recovery of PCR-detectable porcine epidemic diarrhea virus and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus from filter papers under laboratory conditions.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Associations between manure pumping out of the site and exposure to nearby manure applications with the incidence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus and porcine epidemic diarrhea virus outbreaks in wean-to-market pig populations in the Midwestern United States.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- The effect of freeze-thaw and storage on African swine fever virus detection in environmental samples.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Cardiac puncture blood collection as a practical and biosecure method for post-mortem pathogen detection in pigs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring the fall of 2020, the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) L1C.5 variant emerged and rapidly spread throughout southern Minnesota generating questions regarding possible transmission routes. This study aimed to investigate whether PRRSV could be detected on surfaces inside and outside pig barns housing L1C.5 variant PRRSV-positive pigs to illustrate the potential for indirect transmission of PRRSV. Seven Midwestern U.S. PPRS-positive breeding or growing pig farms and one PRRS-negative farm were conveniently selected. Internal and external barn surfaces were wiped using a PBS moistened cloth and the resulting liquid was submitted to the University of Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory for PRRSV RT-PCR testing and virus isolation.
resultsAll (n = 26) samples from PRRSV-negative farm tested negative. Nineteen (13%) out of 143 samples from positive farms yielded positive RT-PCR results. Positive samples originated primarily from exhaust fan cones and doorknobs, followed by anteroom floor and mortality carts/sleds. Virus isolation attempted on two samples did not yield positive results.
conclusionsPRRSV contamination can occur on surfaces inside and outside pig barns that are in frequent contact with farm personnel. Although virus isolation attempts were negative, our results illustrate the potential for PRRSV to be transmitted indirectly through contaminated materials or farm personnel. The study supports the implementation of biosecurity practices by farm personnel to prevent the introduction of PRRSV into farms and the prevention of PRRSV transmission between farms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.