Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334499›Full record

ArticlePorcine health management2024

Assessment of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) farm surface contamination through environmental sampling.

Claudio Marcello Melini, Mariana Kikuti, Laura Bruner, Matt Allerson, Katie O'Brien, Chase Stahl, Brian Roggow, Paul Yeske, Brad Leuwerke, Mark Schwartz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porcine health management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Claudio Marcello MeliniDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Mariana KikutiDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Laura BrunerSwine Vet Center, St. Peter, MN, USA.
Matt AllersonHolden Farms Inc, Northfield, MN, USA.
Katie O'BrienHolden Farms Inc, Northfield, MN, USA.
Chase StahlFairmont Vet Clinic, Fairmont, MN, USA.
Brian RoggowFairmont Vet Clinic, Fairmont, MN, USA.
Paul YeskeSwine Vet Center, St. Peter, MN, USA.
Brad LeuwerkeSwine Vet Center, St. Peter, MN, USA.
Mark SchwartzDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Montserrat TorremorellDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA.
Cesar A CorzoDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA. corzo@umn.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuring the fall of 2020, the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) L1C.5 variant emerged and rapidly spread throughout southern Minnesota generating questions regarding possible transmission routes. This study aimed to investigate whether PRRSV could be detected on surfaces inside and outside pig barns housing L1C.5 variant PRRSV-positive pigs to illustrate the potential for indirect transmission of PRRSV. Seven Midwestern U.S. PPRS-positive breeding or growing pig farms and one PRRS-negative farm were conveniently selected. Internal and external barn surfaces were wiped using a PBS moistened cloth and the resulting liquid was submitted to the University of Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory for PRRSV RT-PCR testing and virus isolation.

resultsAll (n = 26) samples from PRRSV-negative farm tested negative. Nineteen (13%) out of 143 samples from positive farms yielded positive RT-PCR results. Positive samples originated primarily from exhaust fan cones and doorknobs, followed by anteroom floor and mortality carts/sleds. Virus isolation attempted on two samples did not yield positive results.

conclusionsPRRSV contamination can occur on surfaces inside and outside pig barns that are in frequent contact with farm personnel. Although virus isolation attempts were negative, our results illustrate the potential for PRRSV to be transmitted indirectly through contaminated materials or farm personnel. The study supports the implementation of biosecurity practices by farm personnel to prevent the introduction of PRRSV into farms and the prevention of PRRSV transmission between farms.

Indexed as

ContaminationEnvironmental samplingPRRSSurfaces

Identifiers

PMID39334499
PMCPMC11430232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.