Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334468›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

The optimal antibiotic treatment duration for community-acquired pneumonia in adults diagnosed in general practice in Denmark (CAP-D): an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.

Eskild Johansen, Henrik Nielsen, David Gillespie, Rune Aabenhus, Malene Plejdrup Hansen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06295120 (The Optimal Antibiotic Treatment Duration for Community-acquired Pneumonia in Adults Diagnosed in General Practice in Denmark), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06295120 phase4recruitingnot on this map

The Optimal Antibiotic Treatment Duration for Community-acquired Pneumonia in Adults Diagnosed in General Practice in Denmark: an Open-Label, Pragmatic, Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorResearch Unit for General Practice in AalborgRan2023 to 2026Enrolled600ConditionsCommunity-acquired PneumoniaArmsPhenoxymethylpenicillin 1.2 MIE 4 times daily
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eskild JohansenCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. ejoha@dcm.aau.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1578-5429
Henrik NielsenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
David GillespieCentre for Trials Research, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales, UK.
Rune AabenhusThe Research Unit for General Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Malene Plejdrup HansenCenter for General Practice, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of antibiotics is the main driver of antimicrobial resistance which is considered one of the biggest threats to human health. In Denmark, most antibiotics are prescribed in general practice. Acute lower respiratory tract infections, including community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), are among the most frequent indications for antibiotic prescribing. Phenoxymethylpenicillin is established as first-line treatment in general practice in Denmark. However, the treatment duration with phenoxymethylpenicillin is mostly based on traditions. Both 5 and 7 days of treatment is recommended in Danish guidelines, and when asking the general practitioners about what treatment duration, they prescribe the variation is even bigger. Several hospital-based studies have proven short course (≤ 6 days) antibiotic treatment non-inferior to long course (≥ 7 days) treatment of CAP. No evidence exists on the optimal treatment duration for CAP in non-hospitalised patients. This randomised controlled trial aim to investigate the optimal treatment duration with phenoxymethylpenicillin for CAP in adults diagnosed in general practice in Denmark.

methodsThis is an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled, five-arm DURATIONS trial. Participants will be recruited from at least 24 general practices in Denmark. Eligible participants are adults, with no pre-existing lung disease, presenting with symptoms of CAP, and in whom the general practitioner finds it relevant to treat with antibiotics. The study will compare treatment with phenoxymethylpenicillin 1.2 MIE q.i.d. in 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 days. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence for the optimal antibiotic treatment duration of CAP in general practice and inform future guidelines on CAP in all countries using phenoxymethylpenicillin for the treatment of acute respiratory tract infections in adults. The results of this study might also be used to guide treatment recommendations in other countries using phenoxymethylpenicillin. Moreover, a (potential) reduction in antibiotic use might lower the development of antimicrobial resistance, increase patient treatment adherence, reduce risks of adverse events, and lower the economical exp

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06295120. Registered 28 February 2024.  The Scientific Ethics Committee for the North Denmark Region: N-20230039.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCommunity-Acquired InfectionsGeneral PracticePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicAdultDenmarkDrug Administration ScheduleHumansPenicillin VPneumoniaTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillin VAntibioticsCommunity-acquired pneumoniaGeneral practicePhenoxymethylpenicillinTreatment duration

Identifiers

PMID39334468
PMCPMC11429885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.