ArticleMolecular cytogenetics2024
Higher prevalence of poor prognostic markers at a younger age in adult patients with myelodysplastic syndrome - evaluation of a large cohort in India.
Article in Molecular cytogenetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe karyotype is a major determinant of prognosis in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Details of the cytogenetic profile of MDS in South Asia are limited because cytogenetic services are not widely available.
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the cytogenetic and clinicopathologic profile of adult primary MDS seen consecutively at a tertiary-care centre in South India between 2003 and 2017. Patients were re-categorised according to the 2022 World Health Organisation (WHO) and the International Consensus classifications (ICC).
resultsThere were 936 patients aged 18-86 years (median age 53, 65% males), with MDS with del 5q, low blasts and increased blasts in 7.5%, 58.4% and 34.1% respectively. Clonal abnormalities were seen in 55% of patients, with solitary abnormalities in 29.8% and complex karyotypes (CK, ≥ 3 abnormalities) in 15%. The most frequent abnormalities were monosomy 7/deletion 7q (16.1%), deletion 5q (14.5%), trisomy 8 (11.5%), and deletion 20q (5.1%). Cytogenetic prognosis groups were distributed as follows: very good, 2%; good, 55.6%; intermediate, 16.2%; poor, 15%; very poor, 11.2%. Clinical (IPSS-R) risk stratification (842 patients) showed: very low-risk, 3.9%; low-risk, 30.9%; intermediate-risk, 24.2%; high-risk, 21%; very high-risk, 20%. Age-adjustment (IPSS-RA) raised the very low-risk group to 12.4%; the other groups decreased by 1-3% each.
conclusionThe most significant finding of this cytogenetic analysis of MDS in India is that abnormal karyotypes with poor prognosis markers including monosomy 7 and CK were more frequent than in most other reports, among patients who were overall younger. Trisomy 8, deletion 20q, the IPSS-R intermediate-risk and both high-risk groups were more common than in the West. Trisomy 8 was less common than in South-East Asia while CK and deletion 20q were comparable. Evaluation of such large cohorts highlights the unique features of MDS in different parts of the world. These findings suggest that there could be differences in predisposing factors, environmental or genetic, and emphasise the need for further exploration to better understand the varied nature of MDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.