ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2024
A multi-view feature representation for predicting drugs combination synergy based on ensemble and multi-task attention models.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- AI-powered IC50 prediction for p53 inhibitors drug-target interaction via hybrid graph neural networks.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper proposes a novel multi-view ensemble predictor model that is designed to address the challenge of determining synergistic drug combinations by predicting both the synergy score value values and synergy class label of drug combinations with cancer cell lines. The proposed methodology involves representing drug features through four distinct views: Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) features, molecular graph features, fingerprint features, and drug-target features. On the other hand, cell line features are captured through four views: gene expression features, copy number features, mutation features, and proteomics features. To prevent overfitting of the model, two techniques are employed. First, each view feature of a drug is paired with each corresponding cell line view and input into a multi-task attention deep learning model. This multi-task model is trained to simultaneously predict both the synergy score value and synergy class label. This process results in sixteen input view features being fed into the multi-task model, producing sixteen prediction values. Subsequently, these prediction values are utilized as inputs for an ensemble model, which outputs the final prediction value. The 'MVME' model is assessed using the O'Neil dataset, which includes 38 distinct drugs combined across 39 distinct cancer cell lines to output 22,737 drug combination pairs. For the synergy score value, the proposed model scores a mean square error (MSE) of 206.57, a root mean square error (RMSE) of 14.30, and a Pearson score of 0.76. For the synergy class label, the model scores 0.90 for accuracy, 0.96 for precision, 0.57 for kappa, 0.96 for the area under the ROC curve (ROC-AUC), and 0.88 for the area under the precision-recall curve (PR-AUC).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.