ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2024
Effectiveness and safety of canakinumab in cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome: a retrospective study in China.
Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Long-Term Safety of Anti-Interleukin-1 Medications in Children with Rheumatic Diseases: a Systematic Review.Paediatric drugs · 2025Pooled it
- Disproportionality Analysis of Adverse Events Associated with IL-1 Inhibitors in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Neonatal-onset multisystem inflammatory disease caused by aFrontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome (CAPS) is characterized by excessive IL-1β release resulting in systemic and organ inflammation. As an anti-IL-1 agent, canakinumab has been approved with all CAPS phenotypes in USA and European countries. However, the use of canakinumab in CAPS in Chinese patients was rarely reported. In this study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of canakinumab in Chinese patients with CAPS.
methodsPatients with CAPS treated with canakinumab were included. Clinical data were collected retrospectively from medical records. Treatment response was evaluated by CAPS disease activity score, C-reactive protein (CRP), and/or serum amyloid A (SAA) levels. Data was analyzed at canakinumab initiation, at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12, or the last follow-up.
resultsA total of 10 CAPS patients were included. 40% of patients were males, the median age at disease onset was 2.5 (2.5, 6) days and the median duration of follow-up while on canakinumab was 22.5 (8.5, 27.5) months. 80% (8/10) of CAPS patients presented with moderate-severe disease activity before the canakinumab treatment. 30% (3/10) of patients required canakinumab dose increase to control disease activity. After treatments, 60% (6/10) of CAPS patients achieved complete remission without relapse and the rest showed minimal disease activity. Clinical symptoms such as fever and rash were improved significantly in most patients (80%). Although abnormal imaging in brain MRI remained in over half of those patients, neurological manifestations were all relieved. 60% (6/10) of patients received prednisone before starting canakinumab therapy and five of them discontinued prednisone later. The most common adverse event was infection (40%). No serious adverse events occurred during the treatment of canakinumab.
conclusionsCanakinumab may be effective and tolerable for Chinese CAPS patients, helping to reduce the dosage of corticosteroids. However, additional trials on large samples are required to further evaluate its efficacy and safety in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.