ArticleDiagnostic pathology2024
Aberrant positivity for BCOR immunohistochemistry in merkel cell carcinoma - a potential diagnostic pitfall.
Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backrgoundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare, aggressive primary cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma, frequently associated with clonal Merkel cell polyomavirus integration. MCC can pose significant diagnostic challenges due to its diverse clinical presentation and its broad histological differential diagnosis. Histologically, MCC presents as a small-round-blue cell neoplasm, where the differential diagnosis includes basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, hematologic malignancies, round cell sarcoma and metastatic small cell carcinoma of any site. We here report strong aberrant immunoreactivity for BCOR in MCC, a marker commonly used to identify round cell sarcomas and other neoplasms with BCOR alterations.
methodsBased on strong BCOR expression in three index cases of MCC, clinically mistaken as sarcoma, a retrospective analysis of three patient cohorts, comprising 31 MCC, 19 small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) and 5 cases of neoplasms with molecularly confirmed BCOR alteration was conducted. Immunohistochemical staining intensity and localization for BCOR was semi-quantitatively analyzed.
resultsThree cases, clinically and radiologically mimicking a sarcoma were analyzed in our soft tissue and bone pathology service. Histologically, the cases showed sheets of a small round blue cell neoplasm. A broad panel of immunohistochemistry was used for lineage classification. Positivity for synaptophysin, CK20 and Merkel cell polyoma virus large T-antigen lead to the diagnosis of a MCC. Interestingly, all cases showed strong positive nuclear staining for BCOR, which was included for the initial work-up with the clinical differential of a round cell sarcoma. We analyzed a larger retrospective MCC cohort and found aberrant weak to strong BCOR positivity (nuclear and/or cytoplasmic) in up to 90% of the cases. As a positive control, we compared the expression to a small group of BCOR-altered neoplasms. Furthermore, we investigated a cohort of SCLC as another neuroendocrine neoplasm and found in all cases a diffuse moderate to strong BCOR positivity.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that neuroendocrine neoplasms, such as MCC and SCLC can express strong aberrant BCOR. This might represent a diagnostic challenge or pitfall, in particular when MCC is clinically mistaken as a soft tissue or a bone sarcoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.