Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334375›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Qualitative perspectives of Medicaid-insured patients on ambulatory care at an academic medical center: challenges and opportunities.

Mariah B Blegen, Jessica Faiz, Daniel Gonzalez, Vanessa Nuñez, Nina Harawa, Medell Briggs-Malonson, Gery Ryan, Katherine L Kahn

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariah B Blegen *VHA HSR Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), Greater Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA. mblegen@mednet.ucla.edu.
Jessica Faiz *VHA HSR Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, and Policy (CSHIIP), Greater Los Angeles VA Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Daniel GonzalezDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Vanessa NuñezDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Nina HarawaDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Medell Briggs-MalonsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Gery RyanDepartment of Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine, Pasadena, CA, USA.
Katherine L KahnDepartment of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbulatory access to academic medical centers (AMCs) for patients insured with Medi-Cal (i.e., Medicaid in California) is understudied, particularly among the 85% of beneficiaries enrolled in managed care plans. As more AMCs develop partnerships with these plans, data on patient experiences of access to care and quality are needed to guide patient-centered improvements in care delivery.

methodsThe authors conducted semi-structured, qualitative interviews with Medi-Cal-insured patients with initial visits at a large, urban AMC during 2022. Participant recruitment was informed by a database of ambulatory Medi-Cal encounters. The interview guide covered Medi-Cal enrollment, scheduling, and visit experience. Interviews were transcribed and inductively coded, then organized into themes across four domains: access, affordability, patient-provider interactions, and continuity.

resultsTwenty participant interviews were completed (55% female, 85% English speaking, 80% self-identified minority or "other" race, and 30% Hispanic or Latino) with primary and/or specialty care visits. Within the access domain, participants reported delays with Medi-Cal enrollment and access to specialist care or testing, though appointment scheduling was reported to be easy. Affordability concerns included out-of-pocket medical and parking costs, and missed income when patients or families skipped work to facilitate care coordination. Participants considered clear, bilateral communication with providers fundamental to positive patient-provider interactions. Some participants perceived discrimination by providers based on their insurance status. Participants valued continuity, but experienced frustration arising from frequent and unexpected health plan changes that disrupted care with their established AMC providers.

conclusionsThe missions of AMCs typically focus on clinical care, education, research, and equity. However, reports from Medi-Cal insured patients receiving care at AMCs highlight their stress and confusion related to inconsistent provider access, uncompensated costs, variability in perceptions of quality, and fragmented care. Recommendations based upon patient-reported concerns suggest opportunities for AMC health system-level improvements that are compatible with AMC missions.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAmbulatory CareHealth Services AccessibilityInterviews as TopicMedicaidQualitative ResearchAdultCaliforniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesAcademic medical centersAccess to careContinuity of patient careHealth equityManaged careMedicaidQualitative interviewsQuality of health care

Identifiers

PMID39334375
PMCPMC11428444

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.