Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334273›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Perspectives of work readiness among Australian health students trained during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Tegan Podubinski, Belinda Jessup, Melissa Kirschbaum, Jodie Bailie, Susan Heaney, Lyndal Sheepway, Lisa Bourke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tegan PodubinskiDepartment of Rural Health, The University of Melbourne, 38 Green Street, Wangaratta, VIC, 3676, Australia. tegan.podubinski@unimelb.edu.au.
Belinda JessupCentre for Rural Health, University of Tasmania, E Block, Newnham Campus, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.
Melissa KirschbaumCentre for Rural Health, University of Tasmania, E Block, Newnham Campus, Launceston, TAS, 7250, Australia.
Jodie BailieUniversity Centre for Rural Health, The University of Sydney, 61 Uralba Street, Lismore, NSW, 2480, Australia.
Susan HeaneyDepartment of Rural Health, The University of Newcastle, 20 Highfields Circuit, Port Macquarie, NSW, 2444, Australia.
Lyndal SheepwayLa Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Edwards Road, Flora Hill, VIC, 3550, Australia.
Lisa BourkeDepartment of Rural Health, The University of Melbourne, 49 Graham St, Shepparton, VIC, 3630, Australia.

Funding

Australian Rural Health Education Network N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo explore perspectives of work readiness, including readiness to work rurally, among health students trained in Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsParticipants were allied health, medicine, and nursing students in the later years of their degree (third, fourth or final year of an undergraduate entry to practice degree, or second year of postgraduate entry to practice degree), where training is clinically immersive. These students had completed a University Department of Rural Health facilitated rural and remote placement between January 2021 and October 2022. They participated in a cross-sectional online survey (n = 426), comprising Likert-scale questions. Interested survey respondents participated in a semi-structured interview (n = 34). Multiple logistic regression was conducted to examine the predictors of work readiness within the survey, and interview data was analysed via reflexive thematic analysis.

resultsAmong survey respondents, 69.7% felt they would be ready to be a health practitioner when the time came to graduate and 71.8% felt clinically prepared to work in a rural location. Concerns about having developed enough clinical skills on placements to competently practice on graduation and being able to continue studying their course during the pandemic were both predictive of work readiness and feeling clinically prepared to work rurally. Four themes reflecting factors impacting work readiness were developed from interview data: (1) 'I'd estimate probably a 20-30% reduction in face-to-face handling practice over the course of all of my placements' encompassed student concerns regarding the collective impact of cancelled placements and lower patient attendance at healthcare facilities on clinical skill development; (2) 'Two and a half years of sitting behind a computer' related to student experiences of superficial learning and cohort disconnectedness due to online course delivery and loss of on campus simulations; (3) 'I'll still need like a lot of support in my grad year' related to students recognising the need for support and supervision post-qualifying to bridge the gaps in their learning; and (4) 'We are the COVID nurses' encompassed student recognition of skills gained including communication skills, competence with technology and telehealth, knowledge of infection control, and work readiness skills (e.g. adaptability and resilience) as a result of training during the global pandemic.

conclusionsUniversities can support work readiness during pandemic circumstances by fostering clinical skills development through continuation of quality placement experiences and face-to-face curriculum delivery. Although health graduates trained during the pandemic are likely to have a range of additional work ready skills, health services will need to proactively support their transition into the workforce in the coming years.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultAttitude of Health PersonnelAustraliaClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePandemicsRural Health ServicesSARS-CoV-2Students, Health OccupationsStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAllied healthGraduate preparednessMedicineNursingPlacementsRural health workforceTransition to practiceWork readiness

Identifiers

PMID39334273
PMCPMC11428983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.