ArticleBMC biology2024
Scanning sample-specific miRNA regulation from bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing data.
Article in BMC biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Role of MicroRNA in the Behaviour of Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells and Stem Cells from the Apical Papilla: A Systematic Review.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of MicroRNA (miRNA) biomarkers in the diagnosis and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.Irish journal of medical science · 2026Pooled it
- Peripheral and Central miRNA Signatures in Alzheimer's Disease: Tissue-Specific Variability, Sex-Associated Differences, and Implications for Blood-Based Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Article
- Current Evidence Supporting the Role of miRNA as a Biomarker for Lung Cancer Diagnosis Through Exhaled Breath Condensate Collection: A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRNA-sequencing technology provides an effective tool for understanding miRNA regulation in complex human diseases, including cancers. A large number of computational methods have been developed to make use of bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing data to identify miRNA regulations at the resolution of multiple samples (i.e. group of cells or tissues). However, due to the heterogeneity of individual samples, there is a strong need to infer miRNA regulation specific to individual samples to uncover miRNA regulation at the single-sample resolution level.
resultsHere, we develop a framework, Scan, for scanning sample-specific miRNA regulation. Since a single network inference method or strategy cannot perform well for all types of new data, Scan incorporates 27 network inference methods and two strategies to infer tissue-specific or cell-specific miRNA regulation from bulk or single-cell RNA-sequencing data. Results on bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing data demonstrate the effectiveness of Scan in inferring sample-specific miRNA regulation. Moreover, we have found that incorporating the prior information of miRNA targets can generally improve the accuracy of miRNA target prediction. In addition, Scan can contribute to construct cell/tissue correlation networks and recover aggregate miRNA regulatory networks. Finally, the comparison results have shown that the performance of network inference methods is likely to be data-specific, and selecting optimal network inference methods is required for more accurate prediction of miRNA targets.
conclusionsScan provides a useful method to help infer sample-specific miRNA regulation for new data, benchmark new network inference methods and deepen the understanding of miRNA regulation at the resolution of individual samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.