ArticleBMC public health2024
Development and validation of a risk prediction model for older adults with social isolation in China.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The experience of social isolation among community-dwelling older adults: a qualitative study.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- Social Frailty and Social Isolation in Chinese Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Network Analysis.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2025Article
- Creation and verification of a predictive nomogram model for the incidence of social isolation among China's older population.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOlder adults are vulnerable to social isolation due to declining physical and cognitive function, decreased interpersonal interactions, and reduced outdoor activities after retirement. This study aimed to develop and validate a predictive model to assess the risk of social isolation among older adults in China.
methodsUsing data from the 2011 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS). The study cohort was randomly divided into training and validation groups in a 70:30 ratio. We used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis with tenfold cross-validation to identify optimal predictive factors and examined the correlates of social isolation using logistic regression. A nomogram was constructed for the predictive model, and its accuracy was assessed using calibration curves. The predictive performance of the model was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis (DCA).
resultsFrom the 2011 CHARLS database, 4,747 older adults were included in the final analysis, of whom 1,654 (34.8%) experienced social isolation. Multifactorial logistic regression identified educational level, marital status, gender, physical activity, physical self -maintenance ability, and number of children as predictive factors for social isolation. The predictive model achieved an AUC of 0.739 (95%CI = 0.722-0.756) in the training set and 0.708 (95%CI = 0.681-0.735) in the validation set. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test yielded P values of 0.111 and 0.324, respectively (both P > 0.05), indicating significant agreement between the nomogram and observed outcomes. The nomogram showed excellent predictive ability according to ROC and DCA.
conclusionsThe predictive model developed to assess the risk of social isolation in the Chinese older adults shows promising utility for early screening and intervention by clinical healthcare professionals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.