Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334224›Full record

ArticleTrials2024

A multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study to compare the efficacy of goal-directed tranexamic acid administration based on viscoelastic test versus preemptive tranexamic acid administration on postoperative bleeding in cardiovascular surgery (GDT trial).

Jae-Sik Nam, Chung-Sik Oh, Ji-Yoon Kim, Dae-Kee Choi, Ah Ran Oh, Jungchan Park, Jong-Hwan Lee, Sung-Cheol Yun, Kyeng Whan Kim, Min Uk Jang and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05806346 (Tranexamic Acid Administration Strategies in Cardiovascular Surgery), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05806346 narecruitingnot on this map

Tranexamic Acid Administration Strategies in Cardiovascular Surgery: Goal-directed Tranexamic Acid Administration Based on Viscoelastic Test vs. Empirical Tranexamic Acid Administration

TypeinterventionalSponsorKonkuk University Medical CenterRan2023 to 2025Enrolled764ConditionsHeart Diseases, Vascular Diseases, Transfusion Related Complication, Coagulation Disorder, BloodArmsTXA administration, Placebo administration
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jae-Sik NamDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chung-Sik OhDepartment of Anesthesiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, and Institution for Patient-Centered Goal-Directed Strategy, Chungju, Republic of Korea.
Ji-Yoon KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Dae-Kee ChoiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ah Ran OhDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jungchan ParkDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Hwan LeeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Cheol YunDepartment of Biostatistics, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyeng Whan KimDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Min Uk JangCheorwon Public Health Center, Cheorwon-Gun, Gangwon-Do, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Yop KimDepartment of Anesthesiology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul, and Institution for Patient-Centered Goal-Directed Strategy, Chungju, Republic of Korea. taeyop@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0806-8969
In-Cheol ChoiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTranexamic acid (TXA) effectively attenuates hyperfibrinolysis and preemptive administration has been employed to reduce bleeding and blood transfusions in various surgical settings. However, TXA administration could be associated with adverse effects, such as seizures and thromboembolic risks. While patients with fibrinolysis shutdown showed greater thromboembolic complications and mortality, TXA administration may aggravate the degree of shutdown in these patients. Selective TXA administration based on the results of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) would be non-inferior to preemptive TXA administration in reducing postoperative bleeding and beneficial in reducing its risks in patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery.

methodsThis non-inferiority, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial will be performed in 3 tertiary university hospitals from August 2023 to March 2025. Seven hundred sixty-four patients undergoing cardiovascular surgery will be randomly allocated to get TXA as a preemptive (Group-P) or goal-directed strategy (Group-GDT) in each institution (with a 1:1 allocation ratio). After anesthesia induction, TXA (10 mg/kg and 2 mg/kg/h) and a placebo are administered after anesthesia induction in Group-P and Group-GDT, respectively. ROTEM tests are performed immediately before weaning from CPB and at the considerable bleeding post-CPB period. After getting the test results, a placebo is administered in Group-P (regardless of the test results). In Group-GDT, placebo or TXA is administered according to the results: placebo is administered if the amplitude at 10 min (A10-EXTEM) is ≥ 40 mm and lysis within 60 min (LI60-EXTEM) of EXTEM assay is ≥ 85%, or TXA (20 mg/kg) is administered if A10-EXTEM is < 40 mm or LI60-EXTEM is < 85%. The primary outcome is inter-group comparisons of postoperative bleeding (for 24 h). The secondary measures include comparisons of perioperative blood transfusion, coagulation profiles, reoperation, thromboembolic complications, seizures, in-hospital mortality, fibrinolysis phenotypes, and hospital costs. DISCUSSION: The absence of inter-group differences in postoperative bleeding would support the selective strategy's non-inferiority in reducing postoperative bleeding in these patients. The possible reduction in thromboembolic risks, seizures, and fibrinolysis shutdown in Group-GDT would support its superiority in reducing TXA-induced adverse events and the cost of their management.

trial registrationThis trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the registration number NCT05806346 on March 28, 2023. TRIAL STATUS: recruiting. Issue date: 2023 March 28 (by Tae-Yop Kim, MD, PhD). The trial was registered in the clinical registration on March 28, 2023 (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05806346) and revised to the latest version of its protocol (version no. 8, August 26, 2024) approved by the institutional review boards (IRBs) of all 3 university hospitals (Konkuk University Medical Center, 2023-07-005-001, Asan Medical Center, 2023-0248, and Samsung Medical Center, SMC 2023-06-048-002). Its recruitment was started on August 1, 2023, and will be completed on December 31, 2024. Protocol amendment number: 08 (protocol version 08, August 26, 2024). Revision chronology: 2023 March 28:Original. 2023 April 10:Amendment No 01. The primary reason for the amendment is the modification of Arms (adding one arm for sub-group analyses) and Interventions, Outcome Measures, Study Design, Study Description, Study Status, Eligibility, and Study Identification. 2023 May 03:Amendment No 02. The primary reason for the amendment is to modify the Outcome Measures and update the study status. 2023 July 06:Amendment No 03. The primary reason for amendment is to update the chronological study status. 2023 July 07:Amendment No 04. The primary reason for the amendment is the modification of study information (the treatment category was changed to diagnostic, and Phase 4 was changed to not applicable) and a chronological update on the study status. 2023 September 12:Amendment No 06. The primary reason for the amendment is a chronological update in the study status and the inclusion of additional information regarding contacts/locations and oversight. 2023 December 29:Amendment No 07. The primary reason for the amendment is to modify the outcome measures (including detailed information on outcome measures, addition of extra secondary measures, and chronological updates in study status). 2024 August 26:Amendment No 08. The primary reason for the amendment is to add detailed descriptions regarding data handling and the names and roles of the participating institutions and to update the chronological process of the trial.

Indexed as

Antifibrinolytic AgentsPostoperative HemorrhageThrombelastographyTranexamic AcidCardiovascular Surgical ProceduresDouble-Blind MethodEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAntifibrinolytic AgentsTranexamic AcidCardiac surgeryClinical trialGoal-directedRotational thromboelastometryTranexamic acidViscoelastic test

Identifiers

PMID39334224
PMCPMC11429631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.