ArticleBMC oral health2024
Single- versus multi-visit approach for fragment reattachment in complicated crown-root fractures: a cohort study.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Clinical efficacy and prognostic factors of pulpotomy combined with fragment reattachment in treating complicated crown-root fractures of maxillary young permanent anterior teeth].Hua xi kou qiang yi xue za zhi = Huaxi kouqiang yixue zazhi = West China journal of stomatology · 2026Article
- Deep margin elevation in permanent incisors with crown-root fractures: A laboratory study.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- A Biomimetic Adhesive Approach for Restoring a Cracked Tooth in a Single Visit: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2026Article
- Resin Wing Technique With Sandblasting Interface Modification: A 24-Month Stable Pulp Preservation in Young Permanent Teeth With Complex Crown Fractures.Case reports in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplicated crown-root fractures are a type of tooth fracture that involves the enamel, dentin, and cementum and accompanied by pulp exposure. The treatment of a complicated crown-root fracture is always challenging due to the difficulties in achieving a hermetic seal and a stable restoration with a fracture level close to the crestale bone level. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of single-visit and multi-visit approaches for fragment reattachment in complicated crown-root fractures of anterior teeth.
methodsTwo cohort consist of 10 adolescent patients in each group at both genders, who suffered from permanent anterior tooth complicated crown-root fracture were included. Fragment reattachment with root canal treatment was performed with either single or multiple-visit approach. Single visit fragment attachement combined with root cannel therapy was conducted in single-visit approach group immediately after injury. Fragment attachment, root cananel therapy and post resoration were performed during three times ' clinical visit in multi-visit approach group.
resultsAll the patients in both groups achieved satisfactory aesthetic results one year after fragment reattachment. Patients who underwent a multi-visit approach had a significantly shorter operative duration, less intra-operative pain and fatigue, slightly better periodontal health at an early stage, and a decreased incidence of temporomandibular joint disorders compared to those who underwent a single-visit approach. However, multiple visits approach may increase the risk of fragment detachment postoperatively.
conclusionFragment reattachment a reliable but temporary technique for adolescent patients who have suffered from complicated crown-root fractures. Multi-visit approach showed similar effecacy to single-visit approach but with slightly less complications. The choose of these two merhos should depend on the specific patient situation and patient compliance.
trial registrationThis prospective cohort study was retrospectively registered in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300076811) on 19/10/2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.