Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334217›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Religious belongings and Covid-19 vaccination.

Konstantine Chakhunashvili, Eka Kvirkvelia, Davit G Chakhunashvili

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Konstantine ChakhunashviliThe University of Georgia, Tbilisi, Georgia. k.chakhunashvili@ug.edu.ge.ORCID 0000-0003-0939-9479
Eka KvirkveliaDepartment of Gynecology, Caucasus University, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Davit G ChakhunashviliDepartment of Pediatrics, International Black Sea University, Tbilisi, Georgia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionVaccine hesitancy poses a complex global challenge. Our study investigates correlations between COVID-19 vaccination rates, religious demographics, and educational performance. MATERIALS AND

methodsUsing cross-sectional analysis, data from reputable sources were analyzed for correlations using Pearson's correlation and linear regression.

resultsWe found statistically significant positive correlations between COVID-19 vaccination rates and PISA scores, Catholic populations, non-religious, and atheist populations. Conversely, negative correlations were observed with Muslim and Eastern Orthodox populations. Our findings suggest potential influences of religious beliefs and educational attainment on vaccination rates.

conclusionThe data reveals a positive correlation between COVID-19 vaccination rates and the percentages of Catholic, Non-Religious, and Atheist populations, while indicating a negative correlation between COVID-19 vaccination rates and the percentages of Muslim and Eastern Orthodox populations. These findings underscore the potential significance of engaging religious leaders in promoting vaccinations as a strategy to address vaccine hesitancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesVaccination HesitancyCross-Sectional StudiesEducational StatusFemaleHumansIslamReligionReligion and MedicineSARS-CoV-2VaccinationCOVID-19 VaccinesAtheistCatholicCovid-19 vaccinationEastern OrthodoxMuslimNon-religious

Identifiers

PMID39334217
PMCPMC11428539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.