Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39334112›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Mental health literacy for public employees.

Bernardo Oliveira Buta, Antônio Cláudio Pimentel Mota, Vilma V D Couto, Benjamin Miranda Tabak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bernardo Oliveira ButaGetulio Vargas Foundation - School of Public Policy and Government, SGAN 602, Módulo A, B e C, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 70830-020, Brasil. bernardo.buta@fgv.br.
Antônio Cláudio Pimentel MotaGetulio Vargas Foundation - School of Public Policy and Government, SGAN 602, Módulo A, B e C, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 70830-020, Brasil.
Vilma V D CoutoDepartment of Psychology, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro, Av. Frei Paulino, nº 30 - Bairro Abadia, Uberaba, MG, 38025-180, Brazil.
Benjamin Miranda TabakGetulio Vargas Foundation - School of Public Policy and Government, SGAN 602, Módulo A, B e C, Brasília, Distrito Federal, 70830-020, Brasil.

Funding

Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal 3435.154.29827.20102022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough mental disorders are common in the workplace, they often go unnoticed. There is frequently a gap in the recognition and effective management of these disorders, leading to delayed recovery and worsening conditions. This study evaluates the level of Mental Health Literacy (MHL) among employees of the Finance and Planning Departments in the Federal District, Brazil, and proposes preventive measures and de-stigmatization strategies for mental health in the workplace.

methodsMHL among active employees was assessed using the Mental Health Literacy Scale (MHLS), developed by O'Connor and Casey (2015) and validated for Brazilian Portuguese by Buta et al. (2024). The data analysis included descriptive and inferential statistics, with nonparametric tests used to compare MHL across different groups.

resultsThe results showed that 27.6% of participants had adequate literacy, 67.9% had problematic levels, and 4.5% had inadequate levels. Women were observed to have higher literacy levels than men. Additionally, significant variations in literacy levels were noted among individuals with different health conditions; those diagnosed with cancer, depression, or other illnesses had higher literacy than those without diagnosed conditions.

conclusionTo address MHL challenges, educational actions such as awareness campaigns, training, and consultancy programs are essential.

Indexed as

Health LiteracyAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGovernment EmployeesHumansMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWorkplaceYoung AdultMental healthMental health literacyPublic administrationPublic policySurvey

Identifiers

PMID39334112
PMCPMC11429317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.