ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024
Analytical validation of the LungLB test: a 4-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization assay for the evaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomarkers for Lung Nodule Risk Stratification: Are We There Yet?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluation of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) often creates a diagnostic conundrum which may delay the early detection of lung cancer. Rare circulating genetically abnormal cells (CGAC) have previously demonstrated utility as a biomarker for discriminating benign from malignant small IPNs in the LungLB assay. CGAC are identified using a unique 4-color fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) assay and are thought to reflect early cell-based events in lung cancer pathogenesis and the anti-tumor immune response. LungLB is a prognostic tool that combines the CGAC biomarker and clinical features to aid in IPN evaluation by improving the stratification of patient risk of malignancy.
methodsHerein we describe the analytical performance of the LungLB blood test. Analytical validation was performed according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines with adaptations for rare cell-based assays. Multiple operators, reagent lots, and assay runs were tested to examine accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and interfering factors.
resultsThe FISH probes used in the LungLB assay demonstrate 100% sensitivity and specificity for their intended chromosomal loci (3q29, 3p22.1, 10q22.3 and 10cen). LungLB demonstrates analytical sensitivity of 10 CGAC per 10,000 lymphocytes analyzed, 100% analytical specificity, and high linearity (R
conclusionThe analytical performance of LungLB in this validation study successfully demonstrates it is robust and suitable for everyday clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.