ArticleBMC endocrine disorders2024
Are ultrasonographic scoring systems of the salivary gland in primary Sjögren's syndrome suitable for examination of Type2 diabetes mellitus patients with sicca?
Article in BMC endocrine disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The diagnostic performance of salivary gland shear wave elastography to differentiate Sjögren disease from type 2 diabetes mellitus with sicca: a cross-sectional controlled study.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Determinants and clinical correlates of minor salivary gland biopsy findings for suspected Sjögren disease: a single center retrospective analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to compare the salivary gland ultrasonography(SGUS) findings in patients with primary Sjögren's Syndrome (pSS) and diabetes mellitus(DM) patients with sicca symptoms and to examine the relationship between salivary gland ultrasonography (SGUS) findings with clinical and laboratory parameters.
methodsIn this study, 34 patients with pSS and 34 DM patients with sicca symptoms were included. In all patients, bilateral parotid, and submandibular gland ultrasonography (totally 272 glands) was performed by blinded rheumatologist, using the Hocevar and the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) scoring system. Clinic and ultrasonographic variables were compared between groups. The association between SGUS score and disease duration was analyzed by correlation analysis.
resultsPatients with pSS presented significantly higher SGUS scores than patients with DM (the Hocevar score; 20.93(± 9.65) vs. 3.82(± 3.71); p < 0.05, the OMERACT score; 5.96(± 2.30) vs. 2.07(± 1.65); p < 0.05, respectively). In patients with pSS, the submandibular gland scores were significantly higher than the parotid gland scores (right; p < 0.05 vs. left; p < 0.01) while DM patients showed significantly higher parotid gland scores (right; p < 0.05 vs. left; p < 0.05). In pSS patients, the SGUS scores were associated with disease duration (r = 0.57; r = 0.50; p < 0.05), symptom duration (r = 50; r = 0.47; p < 0.05), and the European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI)-dryness score (r = 0.35, r = 0.36; p < 0.05). However, in DM patients, the SGUS scores are highly correlated with the ESSPRI-dryness (r = 0.74, r = 0.72; p < 0.05) and HbA1C level (r = 0.91, r = 0.86; p < 0.05).
conclusionsThis study demonstrated that major salivary gland involvement was more severe and correlated with disease duration, and submandibular gland was dominantly affected in pSS. Contrarily, in DM patients, salivary gland involvement was milder, parotid dominant and related to level of dryness and HbA1C, rather than disease duration when compared to pSS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.