Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Feasibility and effectiveness of a foam rolling intervention in pregnant women requiring bed rest for foetal protection: a randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Incidence, Risk Factors and Characteristics of Late (>2 Years) Recurrence of Deep Venous Thrombosis.Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBed rest during pregnancy can lead to reduced physical activity, impairing lower limb venous blood flow and increasing the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and muscle atrophy. We investigated the clinical efficacy of foam rolling intervention (FRI) in enhancing lower limb venous blood flow, mitigating the risk of DVT and muscle atrophy in pregnant women on bed rest.
methodsThis single-blind, randomised controlled trial enrolled 86 pregnant women with long-term bed rest for foetal protection (≥ 7 days), gestational age ≥ 20 weeks, and maternal age < 40 years. Participants were randomly assigned to a control or experimental group using a random number table. The control group received standard care, whereas the experimental group underwent FRI. Researchers and statisticians were aware of the treatment groups, however, the participants were blinded. Lower limb blood flow velocity, D-dimer levels, incidence of DVT, and the extent of lower limb muscle atrophy were assessed in both groups at baseline and post-intervention (day 7). To account for a 5% attrition rate and potential sampling error, the estimated sample size for each experimental and control group was 40.
resultsBefore the intervention, no significant differences were observed between the experimental and control groups in peak blood flow, mean flow velocity, D-dimer values, or leg circumference (P > 0.05), however, the peak blood velocities of the popliteal veins were significantly higher in the control group (P = 0.031). On the seventh day post-intervention, the experimental group had significantly higher mean and peak blood velocities in femoral and popliteal veins, significantly (P < 0.05), lower mean D-dimer levels (P = 0.035), and a significantly smaller reduction in thigh and calf circumference (P < 0.001). Consequently, the rate of thigh muscle atrophy was significantly slower in the experimental group (P = 0.011).
conclusionsFRI is an effective intervention for improving lower limb venous blood flow, mitigating the risk of DVT and muscle atrophy in pregnant women on bed rest.
trial registrationThis trial was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on June 18, 2024 (registration number: ChiCTR2400085770).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.