ArticleBMC cancer2024
A urine-based liquid biopsy for detection of upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a self-matched study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Distal ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for nonmetastatic distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Conservative Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An Update on Current Diagnostic Modalities and Emerging Biomarkers.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy-guided kidney-sparing management in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: from preoperative risk stratification to perioperative surveillance.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Methylation levels in the GRIN2B promoter region are associated with bipolar disorder and its anxiety and insomnia symptoms.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo establish the pathological diagnosis of UTUC before treatment is profitable. At present, the conventional pathological diagnostic methods have certain problems. Besides, the urine-based DNA methylation test have been already utilized to detect bladder cancer.
objectiveTo evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test and compare the combined test with cytology. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe included 45 patients from April 2019 to May 2022, all of whom underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), nephrectomy, diagnostic ureteroscopy or tissue biopsy. Before surgery, the urine samples were collected for DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test and cytology. The test performance was calculated, and comparative ROC curves were drawn.
resultsThe median age of the patients was 67 years. The Kappa value of the DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test and tissue pathology was 0.59 (p<0.001). The sensitivity/specificity/PPV/NPV of DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test was 86/80/94/62% compared with 29/100/100/29% for cytology. The AUC of DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test was 0.829 (p<0.001).The mutated gene proportion of UTUC patients was 51.43% for TERT and 25.71% for TP53.
conclusionThe test performance of DNA methylation plus 17 genes mutation test was satisfactory, which may replace cytology in the future. Further multicenter studies with larger samples are needed to confirm the clinical value of this promising method. NOVELTY & IMPACT STATEMENTS: We evaluated the diagnostic efficacy of a urine-based liquid biopsy for the detection of UTUC and compared the combined test with cytology. We found satisfactory results and concluded that the test could partly replace cytology. Further studies are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.