ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024
Usability and acceptability of self-testing for hepatitis C virus exposure in a high-prevalence urban informal settlement in Karachi, Pakistan.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody self-testing (HCVST) may help expand screening access and support HCV elimination efforts. Despite potential benefits, HCVST is not currently implemented in Pakistan. This study aimed to assess the usability and acceptability of HCVST in a high HCV prevalence informal settlement in Karachi, Pakistan.
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional study in a hepatitis C clinic from April through June 2023. Participants were invited to perform a saliva-based HCVST (OraSure Technologies, USA) while following pictorial instructions. A study member evaluated test performance using a standardized checklist and provided verbal support if a step could not be completed. Perceived usability and acceptability were assessed using a semi-structured questionnaire. The HCVST was considered successful if the participant was able to complete all steps and correctly interpret test results. Overall concordance and positive and negative agreement were estimated in comparison with the HCVST result read by the study member (inter-reader concordance and agreement) and result of a second rapid HCV test (Abbott Diagnostics Korea Inc, South Korea) performed by a trained user (inter-operator concordance and agreement).
resultsThe study included 295 participants of which 97 (32%) were illiterate. In total, 280 (95%, 95% CI 92-97%) HCVSTs were successful. Overall, 38 (13%) people performed the HCVST without verbal assistance, 67 (23%) needed verbal assistance in one step, 190 (64%) in two or more. Assistance was most often needed in managing the test buffer and test reading times. The inter-reader concordance was 96% and inter-operator concordance 93%. Inter-reader and inter-operator positive percent agreement were 84 and 70%, respectively. All participants reported they would use HCVST again and would recommend it to friends and family.
conclusionSaliva-based HCVST was very well accepted in this clinic-based setting. However, many people requested verbal support in several steps, highlighting the need for clear instructions for use and test devices that are simple to use, particularly in low literacy settings. Moderately low positive percent agreement with the results of a rapid test performed by a trained user highlights potential uncertainty in the accuracy of HCVST in the hands of lay users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.