SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2024
CXCL9/CXCL10 as biomarkers the monitoring of treatment responses in Pulmonary TB patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Emerging insights into CC and CXC chemokines and their receptors in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection.FEBS open bio · 2026Review
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection of Retinal Endothelial Cells Induces Interferon Signaling Activation: Insights Into Tubercular Retinal Vasculitis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- Multilevel systems biology analysis identifies key immune response profiles and potential correlates of protection for M72/AS01E vaccine against tuberculosis.Clinical and experimental vaccine research · 2025Article
- CXCL9 and CXCL10 support the exacerbated humoral response in recovered COVID-19 patients who developed acute respiratory distress syndrome by promoting plasma cell differentiation, whereas CXCL9 also induces CD40L and CXCR3 upregulation on T helper cells.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) remains a persistent threat to global public health and traditional treatment monitoring approaches are limited by their potential for contamination and need for timely evaluation. Therefore, new biomarkers are urgently required for monitoring the treatment efficacy of TB.
methodsThis study aimed to elucidate the levels of CXCL10 and CXCL9 in pulmonary TB patients who underwent anti-TB treatment. The data was acquired from five databases, including PubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. A meta-analysis of CXCL10 data from all time points was conducted. Furthermore, a trend meta-analysis of temporal data of CXCL10 and CXCL9 from multiple time points was also performed.
resultsIt was revealed that patients who responded poorly to anti-TB treatment had higher serum levels relative to those who responded well (SMD: 1.23, 95% CI: -0.37-2.84) at the end of intensive treatment (2 months). Furthermore, heterogeneity was observed in these results, which might be because patients with a prior history of TB and different treatment monitoring methods than those selected in this study were also included. The analysis of alterations in CXCL10 and CXCL9 levels since the last collection time points indicated that their levels reduced with time.
conclusionIn summary, the study revealed that reductions in CXCL10 levels during the first two months of anti-TB treatment are correlated with treatment responses. Furthermore, decreasing levels of CXCL9 during the treatment suggest that it may also serve as a biomarker with a similar value to CXCL10. Future in-depth studies are thus warranted to further probe the relevance of CXCL10 and CXCL9 in monitoring the treatment efficacy of TB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.