ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024
An automated approach to predict diabetic patients using KNN imputation and effective data mining techniques.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between the Dietary Inflammatory Index and Cardiorenal Anemia Syndrome: Evidence From NHANES and Related-Phenotype Exploration in KNHANES.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- A Machine Learning Platform for Imputing Missing Critical Quality Attributes in Pharmaceutical Development.The AAPS journal · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Insights in Cancer Metabolomics: From Subtyping to Biomarker Discovery and Prognostic Modeling.Metabolites · 2025Review
- Explainable AI for Chronic Kidney Disease Prediction in Medical IoT: Integrating GANs and Few-Shot Learning.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Postpartum depression risk prediction using explainable machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Fully-connected network-based prediction model for lymph node metastasis in clinical early-stage endometrial cancer: development and validation in two centers.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diabetes is thought to be the most common illness in underdeveloped nations. Early detection and competent medical care are crucial steps in reducing the effects of diabetes. Examining the signs associated with diabetes is one of the most effective ways to identify the condition. The problem of missing data is not very well investigated in existing works. In addition, existing studies on diabetes detection lack accuracy and robustness. The available datasets frequently contain missing information for the automated detection of diabetes, which might negatively impact machine learning model performance. This work suggests an automated diabetes prediction method that achieves high accuracy and effectively manages missing variables in order to address this problem. The proposed strategy employs a stacked ensemble voting classifier model with three machine learning models. and a KNN Imputer to handle missing values. Using the KNN imputer, the suggested model performs exceptionally well, with accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and MCC of 98.59%, 99.26%, 99.75%, 99.45%, and 99.24%, respectively. In two scenarios one with missing values eliminated and the other with KNN imputer, the study thoroughly compared the suggested model with seven other machine learning techniques. The outcomes demonstrate the superiority of the suggested model over current state-of-the-art methods and confirm its efficacy. This work demonstrates the capability of KNN imputer and looks at the problem of missing values for diabetes detection. Medical professionals can utilize the results to improve care for diabetes patients and discover problems early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.