Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39333903›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2024

A multi-slice attention fusion and multi-view personalized fusion lightweight network for Alzheimer's disease diagnosis.

Qiongmin Zhang, Ying Long, Hongshun Cai, Siyi Yu, Yin Shi, Xiaowei Tan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qiongmin ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China. zqm@cqut.edu.cn.
Ying LongCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China.
Hongshun CaiCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China.
Siyi YuCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China.
Yin ShiCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China.
Xiaowei TanCollege of Computer Science and Engineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a type of neurological illness that significantly impacts individuals' daily lives. In the intelligent diagnosis of AD, 3D networks require larger computational resources and storage space for training the models, leading to increased model complexity and training time. On the other hand, 2D slices analysis may overlook the 3D structural information of MRI and can result in information loss. APPROACH: We propose a multi-slice attention fusion and multi-view personalized fusion lightweight network for automated AD diagnosis. It incorporates a multi-branch lightweight backbone to extract features from sagittal, axial, and coronal view of MRI, respectively. In addition, we introduce a novel multi-slice attention fusion module, which utilizes a combination of global and local channel attention mechanism to ensure consistent classification across multiple slices. Additionally, a multi-view personalized fusion module is tailored to assign appropriate weights to the three views, taking into account the varying significance of each view in achieving accurate classification results. To enhance the performance of the multi-view personalized fusion module, we utilize a label consistency loss to guide the model's learning process. This encourages the acquisition of more consistent and stable representations across all three views. MAIN

resultsThe suggested strategy is efficient in lowering the number of parameters and FLOPs, with only 3.75M and 4.45G respectively, and accuracy improved by 10.5% to 14% in three tasks. Moreover, in the classification tasks of AD vs. CN, AD vs. MCI and MCI vs. CN, the accuracy of the proposed method is 95.63%, 86.88% and 85.00%, respectively, which is superior to the existing methods.

conclusionsThe results show that the proposed approach not only excels in resource utilization, but also significantly outperforms the four comparison methods in terms of accuracy and sensitivity, particularly in detecting early-stage AD lesions. It can precisely capture and accurately identify subtle brain lesions, providing crucial technical support for early intervention and treatment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalNeural Networks, ComputerAlzheimer’s DiseaseLightweight CNNMulti-slice attention fusionMulti-view personalized fusionsMRI

Identifiers

PMID39333903
PMCPMC11437796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.