ArticleBMC bioinformatics2024
LOCC: a novel visualization and scoring of cutoffs for continuous variables with hepatocellular carcinoma prognosis as an example.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe interpretation of large datasets, such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), for scientific and research purposes, remains challenging despite their public availability. In this study, we focused on identifying gene expression profiles most relevant to patient prognosis and aimed to develop a method and database to address this issue. To achieve this, we introduced Luo's Optimization Categorization Curve (LOCC), an innovative tool for visualizing and scoring continuous variables against dichotomous outcomes. To demonstrate the efficacy of LOCC using real-world data, we analyzed gene expression profiles and patient data from TCGA hepatocellular carcinoma samples.
resultsTo showcase LOCC, we demonstrate an optimal cutoff for E2F1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma, which was subsequently validated in an independent cohort. Compared to ROC curves and their AUC, LOCC offered a superior description of the predictive value of E2F1 expression across various cancer types. The LOCC score, comprised of factors representing significance, range, and impact of the biomarker, facilitated the ranking of all gene expression profiles in hepatocellular carcinoma, aiding in the evaluation and understanding of previously published prognostic gene signatures. We also demonstrate that LOCC does not have the same assumptions required of Cox proportional hazards modeling for accurate analysis. Repeated sampling demonstrated that LOCC scores outperformed ROC's AUC in discriminating predictors from non-predictors. Additionally, gene set enrichment analysis revealed significant associations between certain genes and prognosis, such as E2F target genes and G2M checkpoint with poor prognosis, and bile acid metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation with good prognosis.
conclusionIn summary, we present LOCC as a novel visualization tool for the analysis of gene expression in cancer, particularly for understanding and selecting cutoffs. Our findings suggest that LOCC scores, which effectively rank genes based on their prognostic potential, represent a more suitable approach than ROC curves and Cox proportional hazard for prognostic modeling and understanding in cancer gene expression analysis. LOCC holds promise as an invaluable tool for advancing precision medicine and furthering biomarker research. Further research regarding multivariable integration and validation will help LOCC reach its full potential and establish its utility across diverse cancer types and clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.